Firstly, Prof. Schiff corrects the upbeat of the beginning, because it is very important to start the work correctly. It is also important to have more sensibility with the harmonies, and the accents should be more expressive, they imply that the note must be longer and more melodic.
Afterwards, Andras Schiff makes some comments to the student on tempo issues (not ritardando, rhythmical like the heartbeat), dynamics and color variety, darker and more dramatic character, phrasing and other issues regarding harmony.
Besides, the professor suggests her not to play "so correctly" to do so she could think about a storm and playing it with more pedal to increase the sonority - he refers to the Studies by C. Cerny , and the Winterrreise cycle by F. Schubert .
Schiff continues with indications related to character and voices issues, and finally he advises avoiding abrupt gestures by playing the chords: it is more suitable to maintain hands in the air to keep the tension in the audience.
Andras Schiff begins his lecture on 2nd movement with comments on staccato and on the left-hand articulation. Then he makes indications about pedals, right-hand articulation and character regarding tonality. This is Neapolitan tonality, so the accompaniment should be like water, using more pedal to avoid a dry pizzicato.
There is a culminating moment with contrast. During it is necessary to make more difference between the previous warm part and the next cold and martial part: the professor mentions again Winterreise by Schubert and the slow movement of a Symphony by G. Mahler . Later, the warm character returns: left-hand notes should be more melodic and the epilogue very beautiful, like a farewell.
Last movement comes from dream to reality, almost like in the by A. Schoenberg . There are many question marks, and Schiff recommends playing more with the fermatas duration, playing with more freedom. Then the professor corrects the sound balance for the left-hand chords and the tempo.
About the long notes' duration, it is necessary not only to maintain them with the pedal but also keeping the hand on the key. In the coda, a bigger contrast is required but it shouldn't sound "beautiful" in this case, but rather "dangerous".
Finally, Schiff insists on maintaining the chords with the hand and not only with the pedal, and he highlights again the dangerous character of the end.
In this masterclass, Professor Atar Arad makes some corrections about musical aspects of the Viola Sonata by Rebecca Clarke , such as character, fingering, string-crossings, double stops, dynamics, and bowings. They also work on articulation issues. Finally, Professor Arad suggests the student not to play C string on the fingerboard.
Professor Arad gives a general explanation about the piece and the student's performance. Specially, it is interesting to keep in mind the idea to adapt themselves to any situation while playing, and not to do the same thing automatically because they have internalized the process.
Arad explains the period and the spirit of the Romanticism. They work on the tuning about the two instruments (viola and piano). The Professor treats the relation between tuning and sound and gives an explanation about why tuning the viola with A string (and not with the rest).
They also works on general aspects, such as phrasing, position (left hand), color of sound, character, bowing, dynamics (balance with the piano) and articulation.
Professor Arad explains several ways to give more brightness to the piece - e.g. with a complete vibrato work. He also mentions general aspects such as dynamics, bowings, tempo and articulation. The tremolo has to be played in a constant way.
Professor Arad finishes the class with some advises about the tudent's attitude: she must to be more confident.
Firstly, they talk about the cadence: Prof. Arad suggests the student playing his own cadence because it would allow him to be more connected to the work. Professor Arad also mentions several cadences from other concert pieces and he tells a story about Penderecki . It is normal and not bad to get excited when you are going to perform in a concert.
About this specific piece, the professor corrects the fingerboard zone where the first chord must be played. He also recommends the student to play as a practice exercise the Caprice No. 24 by Paganini .
Afterwards, there are musical indications about weight, notes duration, tuning, character, sound quality and contrasts, dynamics or accents. Finally, Prof. Atar Arad insists on the issue of cadences composition.
At the beginning of the masterclass, Professor Canino mentions some acoustic issues and he tells an anecdote to the members of the Trio. Then they work on the tempo, the first entry, and the balance of the dynamic balance between the three instruments. Bruno Canino gives some indications to the piano about pedal, accents and sound and he also gives indications to the strings about character and tuning.
Afterwards, they compare some different works by Beethoven , and they work on some musical issues such as tempo, trills, triplets, dynamics, articulation, repetitions, contrast, color, sound balance, and phrasing. Finally, Canino advises them to look for simplicity and ease.
In this masterclass, Bruno Canino focuses on the rapport between the Trio members. Afterwards, they work on dynamic aspects. Regarding them, they reflect on the subito piano before the crescendo indication, and the drama in Beethoven. Besides some bowing and harmonics indications, Canino makes also corrections on articulation and pedal, suitable tempo for concert performance, rapport, and other considerations about the sound in the three instruments.
Professor Canino explains that the tempo is in 4 and that the changes of character go from serious to agitato and the tempo is associated to each character.
He corrects many aspects of the piano technique, as articulation - staccato or legato -, expressiveness, and pedal. He insists on the chord balance.
Regarding the violin, the student has to pay attention to the dynamics, fingerings, and bowings.
The beginning of the piece in Allegro must be very energetic.
Professor Canino follows the masterclass with some corrections to the piano part again: arpeggiato chords, balanced articulation, dynamics and character. He also explains how to make a good crescendo, different articulations and flexibility within a tempo, among other issues.
In this masterclass, Professor Bruno Canino gives general considerations about tempo it must be faster, use of pedal in the piano part, and dynamics, different accents in the violin part, the melodic relevance of the violin in some moments, articulation, sforzato and pizzicato.
The character of this piece is like a prayer. In general, the student needs to play with more bow contact and speed. In a certain passage containing a great leap, Professor Poppen revises the string change and the finger position to achieve better sound and more strength. Technically, the student has to use more pressure in the middle of the bow towards the fingerboard. In order to get better sound, the bow has to be parallel to the bridge. The professor adds some explanations about articulation in legato.
There are some initial corrections on sound and color, and on rubato and tempo links between the parts of the Poeme . Then Poppen mentions some aspects about the edition circumstances of this composition. Additionally, the professor makes some corrections about shifts, articulations, sound quality, double cords, phrasing, soloist and orchestral parts, and right hand regarding the sound preparation and creation, bowings, etc.
Professor Poppen begins with a brief comment about tuning on the stage. After the performance, he gives the student some advice on the position of her left shoulder, the playing stance and the tension/relaxation in the left hand.
Afterwards, Christoph Poppen makes some indications about the 'capriccioso' character and the expressiveness of the piece; as well as about the vibrato, the sound and the dynamics, among others. He also makes some comments about bow direction, syncopation and accents, bow-strokes, pressure in the strings, pauses, articulations and fingers.
Professor Poppen mainly makes corrections about metrics and tempo: Siciliano should not be so slow, but more like walking, more fluent. However, Vivace should have a more "dancing" tone. In this second movement, he also makes some suggestions regarding the articulation and the duration of the notes.
In the third movement, it is advisable to feel the swing of the dance (in three parts), as well as playing the final note without fermata.
The masterclass starts with a reference to Bizet's opera Carmen and an explanation about the character that the performance of this work should have - not feisty, but more like singing in an elegant way.
Professor Poppen gives several indications on bow quantity, dynamics and phrasing in different moments of the piece. The ornamentation must be softer and, in certain passages, it is necessary to do a freer rubato, at the same time as tenuto, and keeping the tension, the speed and the bow distribution in order to get a better quality of sound. He insists on the student being more charming and showing more beauty instead of power or strength.
Professor Poppen also suggests him to play with more contact in the bow and sometimes to pay attention to the sound and the tuning, with a clear phrasing and spiccato.
Professor Poppen thinks that, since the student has performed the piece with a very good technique, he should then raise the performance to the next artistic level, climb a step forward. It is also necessary to achieve other colors, as well as to work deeper in the search for different sounds. The professor explains how to start the vibrato.
The right hand must be relaxed in the frog part. There are rhythm issues in relation with accelerando and ritardando.
The piece requires more drama and Professor Poppen compares it with Brahms' music. He talks about contrast in the fermata and says that the bow speed is the responsible of the quality of sound.
They also work on bow pressure in double stops and dynamics within phrasing. The student has to recreate an impressionist atmosphere and to control the speed and quantity of the bow and its way to enter into the string - with more or less pressure (the sound is formed from the bow).
In the final fortissimo, the sense of development has to be present by pulling and not stroking the bow. We have to look for the contact point with more flexibility. In moments when the bariolage technique is used, it is necessary to go more into the string. The last chords must be played always in tempo.
Professor Clevenger sincerely congratulates the student for her performance and talks about the two main aspects to work on: emphasize and colors. He also makes corrections on duration - short notes have to be clearer - and rhythm - in transitions when a passage in different style comes, rhythmical changes must be heard clearly.
There are several ways to perform a passage, the key is to be able to do it in any way we choose. Clevenger identifies a certain quote of Respighi's Feste Romane in Bozza. This piece is somehow like a study in relation to articulation, as it works on many sorts of accents systematically.
Professor explains how to distribute time delay in a regular ritardando of a passage and the ways to work on. In a fragment that reminds Gregorian Chant, Clevenger talks about character and mood and the way to study legato in pianissimo. Finally, he comments that each note must be played with all its duration, not to cut earlier.
In this masterclass, Professor Dale Clevenger makes some general explanations regarding the tuning for this instrument: right hand must be used to manipulate and correct the horn tuning. In this sense, if the sound is too much low, the student should place his hand upper. The student practices this with a passage from the Hindemith's work and Professor Clevenger also makes more theoretical explanations about the three methods to tune the horn.
About the performance of the student, Professor Clevenger makes some corrections on rhythm, dynamics, character, articulation and phrasing. They also deal with attitude issues: the musician should be telling a story all the time and using his fantasy to perform as in an opera.
To finish, the professor gives some indications to achieve the appropriate articulation in a certain passage.
In this masterclass, Professor Dale Clevenger talks firstly about the jazzy character for this second movement of the Horn Concerto. He highlights the importance of knowing improvising and playing the syncopation rhythm in connection with the piano.
They also work on musical issues such as the pulse, legato and accents, rhythm, dynamics, and breathing before a certain passage, among others.
After some brief questions about the student's horn studies, Professor Clevenger talks about his own recordings, and about the difficult to find the correct place to breathe in this Horn Excerpt.
Then, Dale Clevenger points out the need to play with a good articulation (as "speaking" with logic and common sense) and - to achieve this - he advises the student to play piano but thinking in forte. They also work on the mouth position and pressure to get a better sound for a particular note.
Professor Clevenger also recommends other fingering for a certain passage, and he explains the meaning of several German indications in the score. Character should be mysterious.
Finally, Dale Clevenger makes some corrections on dynamics and he suggests to the student the best way to practice for getting a better sound.
Professor Clevenger talks about the difference between the projection of the sound while playing either with orchestra or with accompanying piano. They work on articulation and the Professor comments that it is not necessary to stress the anacrusis for the phrasing. They insist on the tuning of chord intervals. Professor Clevenger gives an explanation about the square note and its effect in the score, and also talks about the character, the accents and the slurs of the piece.
At the beginning of this masterclass, Professor Clevenger mentions the initial horn solo in this piece and the required attitude and personality that the student should show when playing it in an audition: with conviction and leader attitude. Besides, Clevenger corrects the student the right-hand position and the embouchure pressure.
Finally, the professor recommends taking a deep breath between two particular phrases so that he can get more air: it is necessary to "tank up" enough.
First of all, Professor Geringas corrects the tempo and he suggests the student to play sostenuto from the beginning of the piece.
Then they work on dynamic levels related to the corresponding character. Prof. David Geringas also makes some indications about harmony, rhythm, piano and cello rapport and articulation among other issues. Then they discuss about the different editions and their relevance. Afterwards they review the end of the Adagio and the measure to go into the Allegro molto part.
About this second part, David Geringas makes some comments on different execution aspects such as the rhythm and agogics, the character, the quality and clarity of the sound as well as about phrasing, dynamics, attitude in the performance, dialog with the piano, harmony and contrast, etc.
The masterclass ends with some indications about sforzato/forte piano, shoulder relaxation, bowings, and quality of sound in the fortissimo moments.
At the beginning, Professor Geringas explains general aspects such as tempo, agogics and character in relation to Brahms Cello Sonata No. 1 . The student has to choose the right tempo for the whole movement selecting it from a different place that the introduction. Later they works on articulation, dynamics, sound, structure and climax in relation to the expression, rhythm and phrasing.
Professor Geringas focuses on the sound balance with the piano, the rapport and dialogue among parts, both instruments playing as an exchange. He also comments some aspects related to the bow and how to get the highest intensity.
There are two main ideas in this class: the pulse maintenance during the whole movement and the differences among the themes of Brahm's Cello Sonata movement. Most of the explanations are focused on these issues.
Additionally, there are general corrections in different aspects, such as rhythm, articulation, phrasing, double tremolo in cello part, always in relation to musical and formal domain.
To establish the tempo of the Brahm's Cello Sonata No. 2 , performers must first look for it in the intermediate passages of each movement, and then bring that same tempo to the beginning.
One must pay attention to musical changes on the score (e.g., one passage turns to espressivo). Clarity of bass pitches is advisable, to explore sound possibilities of the cello as a horn, bassoon, or drums.
Some important comments in this masterclass are: the significance of the first cue at the beginning of the piece -where a brilliant character is required; the connection of the rhythm in the cello part with Latin rhythms (like Tango); and the accuracy of the score.
David Geringas also talks about tempo in the whole sonata, explaining that there is always a connection among movements. Music is always 'crescendo' in the sense of growth, of development.
In this masterclass, Professor Geringas encourages the student to search a full range of expressiveness, based on elements such as dynamics, intensity, articulations and tempo. Geringas also explains the context of this movement in the whole sonata and in relation with the author's symphonies. They talks about the Bohemian character of the piece, as well as general aspects such as coordination - both rhythmical and expressive one - with the accompanying part, phrasing, pauses and resolutions.
Prof. Geringas starts his lecture with a comment about a dynamical matter: there is a difficulty with the dynamical balance because there are many piano shades (p - ppp) in this piece. So, the student must consider them related to each other and he must play with the intensity of the piano. At the beginning, the student also should play stronger than the piano, all the things the student does, should make sense.
Then, they speak about the meaning of the diminuendo and after that, the professor recommends him to read about the short story of Pierrot Lunaire on which this piece is based. They also reflect on more instructions written in the score: agogics terms like animando and rubato, sound quality and character terms, etc.
For David Geringas it is important to find words whose help him to go with the musical expression. In a certain part, the pianissimo must have sound and articulation, and then Geringas makes other corrections related to articulation and phrasing, sound role for each instrument, sound balance and dynamics, among others.
Prof. Geringas also works with the student the bow and right arm motion, and the most suitable way to distribute the weight of the hand to obtain a better quality of the sound. Geringas encourages him to dedicate a daily time to work...
At the beginning of the second movement, Prof. Geringas corrects the tempo and checks it with a metronome. The professor points out the American jazz influence, and he mentions The Entertainer by Scott Joplin . Geringas also indicates how to practice the initial pizzicati to get more sound. The student should not think that Debussy's compositions need to be played very rubato, but think how to play them with more metrical accuracy and, from that point on, how to reach the appropriate metrical freedom.
About expressiveness, Geringas mentions the character of Lindoro from The barber of Seville and he links this moment of the Debussy's work with a scene about this character and Bartolo. Besides, the professor thinks about the word "ironic" in the score, and how to carry it out. Based on this, he tells an anecdote about the cellist Eleonore Schoenfeld who used the facial language, and he continues insisting on expressivity and how to get the different characters. He goes on his lecture giving some instructions about piano dynamic, pizzicato, contrasts or agogics. To conclude with, Prof. Geringas comments that this movement is like a theatre with a unique actor.
In this masterclass, Professor Geringas makes some comments on sound production and contact with the instrument. Professor and student work on dynamics, indications written (and "no written") in the score, phrasing, meaning of "morbido", sound balance to get diminuendo from pianissimo, accents, and so on.
Professor Geringas tells a story about a competition related to this Cello Sonata and he explains the importance to play all the written indications and the relativity of all the things, including the music. Finally, Professor insists on dynamical issues and he gives to the student an advice to play better the piano voce at the end of the piece.
First remark from Geringas in this masterclass is concerning the Maestoso character: the student should think on it like a king's march, holding the tempo. He also reflects on music like a memory and musicality: the student must decide the musical development, what is important and how to build the phrases to give continuity to the music.
David Geringas makes mainly musical indications related to tempo, tension, rhythm, agogics, expression and attitude of the musician. Regarding the second theme, the character is completely different (cantabile, soft, dreamy) and it has to be prepared. The student must correct the intensity and the professor highlights the importance of vibrato to get the proper color for a certain "espressivissimo" moment. It is also important to feel how the air starts to move and vibrate, and how it is transmitted to the audience to "move" their ears or hearts. The student must find this suitable type of vibrato with bow pressure, control, movement and speed, with fingers contact, so that the resulting sound is magic.
Afterwards, they work on bow (not always sul tasto), metrics and agogics, rhythms and accents. Finally, Geringas suggest the student to be more convincing, to show clearly what he wants and taking into account the importance to keep the...
In general, Professor Geringas comments that it is important to think about the sound that the musician wants to provide, because there are a lot of possibilities. He then recommends vocalizing the sound with the cello in the same way that a singer does with his voice.
Afterwards, they work on legato, bow changes related to the tempo of the piece (Adagio), dynamics, and sound preparation with the breathing.
The student should move the body like an instrument producing a sound. After an issue about bow distribution, the professor suggests the student to answer his own questions regarding the music by himself.
Professor David Geringas remarks that some editions do not include a specific sforzato. Regarding the character, there is such a great energy in this piece that the performer feels motivated to go ahead, it is a constant drive. The student should not lose the higher lines even if there are very intense bowings. The student must pay attention to the character of every single motif. The syncopations help to reinforce the intention of the character. As the movement of the piece is steadily growing and developing, it is not possible to play every passage in the same way.
Professor Geringas insists on articulation and on the need of being faithful to the original. He makes a study of different articulations and the most appropriate setting for each of them. It is not advisable to play spiccato in the passages where lightness is not required and tempo has to be strictly kept. Professor Geringas asks the student to distinguish between the different energies demanded by the composer and to create more contrast among them. He also talks about the syncopations as an expressive resource.
It is necessary to know the full score very well and the voice that is carrying out the theme every time. Finally, Professor Geringas gives two interesting ideas: when we want to achieve more sound,...
First, Professor Geringas corrects the tempo of the student's performance of this movement. It is an emotional piece, so it is advisable not to use too much bow and to maintain the contact but with less weight. After that, they comment the orchestral instruments for this cello concerto and the characteristics and expressive differences between the theme and the recitative parts.
After an indication about harmonics, Professor Geringas insists on the character of the piece and the kind of feelings and emotions that the student should show when playing it.
Finally, Professor Geringas gives to the student a general advice about the relevance of knowing the reasons why the composer wrote each work. According to him, it is important to know the history, life and context of the composers, so that the students can get in touch with their inspiration, character and feelings.
The first part of this theoretical masterclass is about sound quality. Professor Geringas suggests that the first step to avoid an "ugly" sound lies in admitting it, then it is necessary to take care of the bow speed, weight and movement so that the strings can always vibrate. They work on the cello position to achieve this and Professor Geringas proposes to the student an exercise to improve the quality of his sound.
The second part of the masterclass consists on explanations referred to dynamics: not to consider it as something absolute but relative because it depends on its context. As an example, David Geringas mentions the Ligeti Concerto . He also talks about acoustic issues and the difference with the electric cello - Prof. Geringas plays the beginning of the Adagio and Allegro, Op. 70 by Schumann . Geringas suggests thinking about how the sound spreads outside and not how is the sound inside the cello.
To conclude, the professor compares this with the gestures of a conductor.
In this masterclass, the student dances the minuet and plays the viola at the same time in order to feel better the beat. Then Diemut Poppen gives him some indications about bow direction and distribution. It is important not to play everything in the same point of the bow. The professor insists on the right setting of the strong beat without moving the viola.
The bass note of the chord must sound louder but without delaying the tempo. Finally, Poppen gives some instructions on the position and the way to hold the bow to improve it.
Firstly, Poppen gives a general indication to the student: he must not move the viola while playing. Besides, the tempo should be faster for this movement.
Then she makes other comments about the difference between playing in a major or minor tonality, bow direction and bow speed. She cannot listen properly the bass, so she suggests to play it louder. The student also should have fun with the small slurs.
For Poppen, the character for this Gigue is very joyful so she recommends the student to enjoy more. After some indication on phrasing, accents and shifts, Poppen gives the student some pieces of advice on the bow: he must be careful so he does not touch the string with the bow wood and the bow hair must be sufficiently tense. Then they practise it up bow and finally the student plays again the whole movement (without repetitions) and the professor makes him some recommendations on dynamic at the end of the piece and fingering to improve the tuning. She also suggests briefly some exercises to improve the strength in the fourth finger.
Professor Diemut Poppen explains that the tempo in the student's performance is too fast. Unlike the Courante, the Allemande is not a "jumping dance', but gentler and more melodic. It also needs more bow and energy in general. Regarding melodic issues, the bass voice is the most important in the piece and it needs more bow. The interval leaps must be shorter in contrast with the whole phrase, which should be longer. The voices have to be dynamically connected. All the voices have to be clear in the fast passages. When playing and practising the phrasing, it is necessary to be aware of the harmonic movements.
The index finger is the connection from the arm to the string, so if the student raises the finger all the time she loses a lot of sound. She has to practice every note with the index finger and play scales in that way and then with all the fingers. Professor Poppen comments that it is very useful to play some studies detache. The student has to take into account that, although during the Baroque period the way of playing is lighter and softer, it is very important not to lose the contact point with the string.
In this masterclass, Professor Diemut Poppen indicates the student that she has too much stress when playing, and that she should avoid unnecessary movements with the viola, as well as take care of her body posture, which tends to bend forward. The student also has to control the bad habit of breathing nervously. The trills must be shorter, as if she was playing a brief ornamentation. The student should think the pulse is in 3 in order to avoid jeopardizing the performance of the whole movement.
Professor Poppen also gives some advice about the most suitable bowings in certain passages; and she indicates that in less important moments, the student can play rubato to make the phrase more interesting, as well as to highlight the dynamics in the most relevant passages harmonically wise. Regarding phrasing, Professor Poppen considers that all the phrase ends should be softer. At the end of the class, Professor Poppen focuses on some technical exercises to monitor the movements of the fingers in the left hand. They practice scales in several positions and with one and two strings.
This masterclass begins with short dynamical corrections. Afterwards, Professor Diemut Poppen points out that the left hand - especially the thumb - has a bad position, and there are some notes out of tune because of a wrong fingering.
They also deal with bowing issues related to articulation and phrasing. Professor Poppen also advises the student to practice slowly in order to improve the attunement of the intervals and she recommends her to take care of the articulation.
Finally, they work on phrasing regarding the harmony of each passage.
First, Professor Poppen explains that the student should play with more elegance, and she indicates him how to raise and stop the bow to improve his performance.
Professor Poppen also recommends using more mane to get a darker sound and she gives other bow indications. Afterwards, they work on tuning and Professor Poppen suggests the student some bowing exercises.
They also work on the weight of the right arm, the movement of the elbow and the relaxation posture. To improve these right arm issues, Professor Poppen suggests more exercises.
Finally, she offers the student further advice about bow, tuning, vibrato, pressure, etc.
In this masterclass, Professor Brunner talks about the main aspects of clarinet technique and expression through a piece of the contemporary repertoire. He gives indications such as phrasing in relation to some formal passages - e. g. the advisability to separate the resolutions from the rest of the phrase -, tempo through the whole piece, accents and articulation, tempo, position of the fingers, dynamics and clarity and precision of the sound
Professor Brunner works on Muczynski's Time Pieces, Op. 43 , second movement, focusing on aspects such as expression, dynamics and phrasing. He explains all the details related to those parameters along the whole movement.
This masterclass starts with some general comments on the story and style of the composition, and then the professor makes references to Prokofiev and The Rite of Spring by Stravinsky .
About this specific first movement, they mainly work on fingerings to get the required articulations, and cues to play them together. Character should be more elegant, and articulation more accurate. They also work on the rhythmical precision, rapport, rubato, tempo, clarity, agogics, accents and articulations.
For this movement, tempo should not be so slow. Prof. Brunner also comments that the sound should not have any nuance, but far away and monotone. At the end, any diminuendo is required, and the legate must be improved. Finally, Eduard Brunner compares the character for this movement with the Piece No. 1 for solo clarinet by Stravinsky .
For this final movement, there are comments on dynamics and character (it should be happier and "jocoso"). The student practices alone her initial part because she has to improve her rhythmical accuracy, and then the second clarinettist also corrects a fast-musical descending passage.
Prof. Brunner focuses on tempo and rhythm. He also mentions that certain word in the score doesn't mean to play so forte. For a specific intervallic fragment, Brunner suggests other fingering and he works on it in detail with the second clarinet to obtain the proper rhythm and articulation. Reaching the end, they should not hurry up. Afterwards, they should avoid prolonging the notes in the pauses.
Firstly, Professor Nebolsin suggests the student to work this piece with metronome: tempo can be changed but not chaotic, and the musician should always have a good reason to modify it.
Afterwards, Eldar Nebolsin makes some corrections on rhythm, dynamics, phrasing, trills, pedal and color, among other musical aspects. They work also on issues related to the left hand, tempo and character, basically.
First of all, Professor explains a passage where the chords are very important at the beginning of the phrase and the relevance of the fermata at the end. Moreover, in this piece it is very advisable to highlight the parts in which the harmony has a psychological sensation of surprise.
Eldar Nebolsin plays several passages to show to the student some aspects, making him suggestions on character and articulation, or different attacks to get a specific sound. They work on rhythm, harmony, dynamics, pedal, left hand technique, color and expression among other things during the class.
At the beginning of the class, Professor Helmerson thinks that the student is underestimating herself, and therefore he suggests her to be more confidence and not be afraid of exaggeration: she needs a greater liveliness for the strong and cheerful character of this movement. Then the professor makes a brief approach to the emotional state of the creative genius and includes a commentary on J.S. Bach . Concerning this rondo in particular, they work on articulation and character - which is very Rossini , as well as on bowings, control, distribution and bow speed.
The student has to think in a horizontal bow movement to ensure a continuity in the sound. The phrasing may be freer and not so rigorous in a specific passage. The relaxation of the arm is necessary when the bow is out of the string. The bowings must sound as a great line, not as an independent movement. The sixteenth notes have to be played different every time they are repeated in a passage.
Other considerations during the class are sound preparation, string rapport with the piano, sound balance and quality, different attacks, lyrical character, triplets, and contact point close to the bridge in certain passages.
The feeling of the arm in the air, when the bow is out of the string, is similar to that of a tennis player. Body movements and sound preparation: do not be passive, but active and relaxed and ready to react. When you want to play forte -with more intensity- a previous relaxation is necessary, and when you play, the attack must have more contact in the string and should be closer to the bridge. Finger, arm and hand position should be at the same level as the strings, not opposite. Relaxation (instead of crashing) is very important. Sound balance and rapport between cello and piano. In the central passage, the student must calm down and does not need to lead....
There is a specific musical intention at the beginning with the first crescendo. Other considerations about tempo: it must be maintained (not rallentando). Corrections on glissando.
Regarding bowings, the professor works on the right point to place and slide the bow and on the clarity in a specific passage. There are also explanations about Britten's character, quality of sound, color, fingerings, vibrato, and harmonics; as well as about his interpretation and the length of the last notes in the phrases.
This masterclass begins with a brief tempo correction. Then Prof. Helmerson encourages the student to go ahead: she needs to 'provoke' her technique instead of following her technique. About tuning, Frans Helmerson suggests how to place the fingers so that the D flat sounds not so high. Besides, the student should find the more suitable vibrato for a certain passage. Other passage requires a sound with more rhythm. For playing the end of the movement, Helmerson proposes a fingering change.
Coming back to the beginning of the Prelude, the professor corrects the movement of the right arm and the position of the elbow in the first chord. Besides, it should be played not as singing, but as talking.
In general, the student presses too much the wrist down when she is playing powerful passages. Rather than this, Prof. Helmerson recommends her to maintain the wrist more stable otherwise she will lose strength in the fingers and feeling of contact. In the professor's opinion, it is related to the arm and fingers' position and not to the shoulders' position - as the student mentions.
Firstly, Frans Helmerson mentions the difficulty of this movement. Rhythm is the most important aspect. Prof. Helmerson recommends also to use the thumb in certain moments.
About the passage with big intervals, Helmerson suggests to be more "dry" in the technique, keeping the hand closer to the fingerboard (not jumping too much). Besides, the professor makes some indications about sound quality and maintenance.
Regarding the end of the movement, Helmerson recommends to play using more contact with the bow (folk music) and not too quickly, keeping the last chords as long as possible. The student must show confidence.
To conclude, they return to the beginning of the Sardana: here tempo is not yet clearly defined, it is freer. He makes also an indication about bowings.
To begin with, Professor Helmerson suggests the student more suitable shifts and fingerings more suitable for a certain passage. Besides this, Frans Helmerson makes some comments on accents, sound quality or bow changes, among other issues.
In general terms, the basic character for this Scherzo should be more 'giocoso' and not so dramatic.
Although Professor Helmerson considers that the student has played well and correctly, he misses more expressiveness: character could be intimate, but without losing in expression or sound.
Additionally, the professor comments some musical issues about the cantabile character, rhythm and energy, or dynamics. He also suggests the student to play last note to the frog, so that he gets a better ending of the sound.
Finally, Helmerson advises him to play this Largo avoiding thinking in numbers of bars, but trying to convey feelings.
In this masterclass, they address the corporal position and the importance of keeping to keep a good posture to get a good expression and to avoid bad habits.
Afterwards, Professor Helmerson makes some indications about contrast, rhythm, modulations, phrasing, among other issues. Helmerson advises the student to show properly how he feels the musical changes.
Then, they work on other musical issues related to the bow, character and sound.
Finally, they look over the ending: this should be very virtuoso, without stopping until finishing. In last four bars, the student should give the feeling that he is almost standing up.
In this masterclass, they first work on the better way to grab the bow, the elbow movement, and the pressure and contact with the string taking into account the physical conditions of the student. Then, Professor Helmerson makes some corrections about musical aspects such as the harmony, dynamics, fingering, rhythm, vibrato, bowings, articulation and character. About the end, Helmerson recommends not to play so slowly the last two arpeggios because the next movement is played attaca and she should keep in mind how to finish this second movement.
Professor Helmerson places the compositions by Grieg in the Norwegian landscape and the bucolic character. He also explains that this sonata should be played thinking on the pastoral songs based on folklore and old popular tradition in the Norwegian mountains.
Finally, Helmerson makes some corrections about bowings and rhythm.
Professor Helmerson starts the explanation by asking the student about his daily methods of study and how he usually works the scales and the technical issues. Helmerson thinks that the student's sound is not completely round because of the bow speed. To correct this aspect, they work on scales in detail, controlling the speed during the whole bowing. The Professor encourages the student to be more demanding on himself and not to compromise with a poor execution. Moreover, the student must pay attention to every movement of his arm and be aware of how much bow he must use in each new articulation.
Professor Helmerson also talks about the character and color of the piece. The musician should avoid playing "nice" every time, it depends on the expression of the music (for example, Picasso used to say: "I don't know what beauty is, but expression I do").
They work on the passage to change to the Allegro vivace. The right hand has to hold the bow in a simple way. Helmerson comments that the tempo chosen by the student is good to play every detail with enough attention, and without having to change the idea of the work by playing slower or faster.
Helmerson also explains some general ideas: for example, in the sound the energy comes from the point of the bow where we are...
Frans Helmerson gives some indications about articulation accuracy and conscious listening to what is being played. Moreover, he talks about contrasting passages: some require more dancing character, while others need to be performed as a variation.
Frans Helmerson talks about the work as a whole - it is necessary to identify folk elements from every movement (rhythms, articulations, accents, etc.): sophistication without losing its popular character.
The vibrato is too intense for the sound of this piece (the required character is more tender). Indications about agogics: keep the same pulse and do not take breaks that do not exist. Bow technique: both hands must change their character at the same time, with a deeper bow (more contact) and projection in last notes. Specific corrections on fingerings.
In a movement such as this, an expressive person like the student must distance himself to avoid being too carried along (expressiveness is there by itself).
Digression about the work in general: it is like a Brothers Grimm's tale (it experiences mood swings, going from the nicest fairy tale to the cruelest nightmare).
In this masterclass, most of the indications and corrections are focused on the character and its technical implications, such as the character of the piece regarding the bowings.
There are other comments: explanations about expressiveness (do not relax the tension in the expressive passages) and syncopation -in ancient music it is anticipated (folk music comes from ancient traditions); general corrections on accents, contrasts of character and phrasing (responding to the excitement of the passage); double pitches, which require a breach from the previous music (two different worlds).
It is very advisable to enjoy the interchange between rotation harmonic and no harmonics pitches, as well as to remove the habit of lengthening the end of a line; vibrato must be kept until the next note.
Professor Helmerson proposes different fingerings to get more color contrast. The student has to avoid useless body movements, at the same time, that to think the music, as he is a singer, imagining the way in which a singer would do it. Moreover, he talks about the flexibility in the rhythm, the vibrato in some specific passages and the need to avoid glissandi by making extensions of the fingers, a very important point in the cello technique.
Professor Helmerson explains the tempo of the sixteenth notes, which establish the tempo of the whole movement. The projection of the sound has to be 'exuberant', maintaining a melodic line between the rhythm and the sound.
Helmerson insists on keeping the tempo and remaining the same melodic line in the link to the Trio. He also advises the student to avoid rushed shifting and remarks the accuracy of the tempo in dotted eighteenth notes and sixteenth ones.
In this masterclass, Professor Gunter Pichler works in depth on different passages and fragments of the movement with the Art Quartet. They focus on tuning, tempo, rhythm, articulation, character, dynamics, glissandi, shifts, quality of sound, and accents; as well as on the balance among all the instruments.
Professor Gunter Pichler works on the cello introduction in detail: less bow, attention to the rhythm, tempo and more concentrated sound. Later on, in the rest of the movement, they work on rhythm and sound (it is advisable to play with 'more air'), character, harmony, balance, articulation, vibrato and fingerings. Pichler explains that 'sotto voce' and 'mezza voce' come from singing, but it is not necessarily pianissimo. The chords have to be played with more weight and extension of the bow, constantly being aware of the harmony.
Professor Gunter Pichler thinks that the students have to play with more contrasting dynamics and to study all the possibilities of expression. The character of the piece is like a dance and it should be sang as a human voice.
Other topics that professor Pichler comments are: articulation and quality of sound. Regarding the dynamics, he talks about the connection between forte and piano, the clarity of diminuendo and crescendo, different ways to play a pianissimo depending on the ensemble (orchestra, quartet, soloist, etc.) and the recommendation to avoid pianissimo dynamics in the solos.
About bow and expression, professor Pichler talks about vibrato, bowings, how to play a forte - without stopping the bow -, bow preparation in cello part and bow quantity required in several moments.
Finally, other topics are phrasing, tempo, tuning, articulation, tempo, and the student's attitude while playing.
In general terms, this masterclass combines the specific study of the piece with pieces of advice for an artistic career. During the class, they work on fingerings, accents, the ability to listen to oneself, methods of study, rhythmical accuracy, tempo, bow, body language, coming up with a proper system to study and the solutions to different problems. He also gives pieces of advice related to how to study, automatization of the movements while playing, mental and body control, selection of the repertoire for an audition or concert, etc.
Professor Pichler comments at the beginning of the class that a good fingering helps in a difficult passage although it is not very well worked. But it helps to improve quickly. The student should pay attention to the crescendos because they do not mean to play louder.
Musicians study many hours so it is necessary to think before playing in order to avoid wasting time. This is a problem of focussing.
Later during the class, Professor Pichler and the students use the metronome to find the correct tempo in this movement.
Pichler explains that there are three possibilities to play a note: with no vibrato, with vibrato and an intermediate stage in which the vibrato is very soft and supports the quality of sound.
In this second part of the masterclass, Professor Pichler focuses on the first violin part because of its difficulty. The Professor talks about the mutual influence between both hands: if we have difficulties or tensions in the left-hand this will be noticed on the right one and vice versa.
Pichler gives his opinion about crucial issues related to the difference between a good performer and a mediocre one: what makes the difference between them is that the good performer thinks much more, he or she is much more reflective. Therefore, the students should think more to avoid lose control over the piece they are playing.
Gunter Pichler also comments how convenient is to ask when we are not able to solve a technical problem on our own. They also work on how to support one another in the group to balance the difficulties of each instrument.
During the whole class, Pichler talks about different methods of study, recommendations about readings, strategies to prepare themselves for a concert and how to study for doing an efficient work and a fruitful rehearsal.
In this masterclass, Professor Schellenberger explains some questions related to lightness, color changes, fluency and accents in phrases. Then, Schellenberger recommends a new fingering for the trills. It is also important keeping in mind playing in a proper timing.
Prof. Schellenberger recommends not to move the mouth, but to keep it opened for controlling and getting a good embouchure. They work also on the phrasing, dynamics, energy and relaxation, breathing, articulation or apoggiaturas among other musical aspects referred to this Sonata.
Finally, Schellenberger gives the student some advises to improve his tuning and to get a clearer and more natural sound, considering that this Sonata is easier to be played for flute -the original instrument -, than for oboe.
In general, Prof. Schellenberger indicates the student that he should improve the sound clarity, articulation, and he should also avoid stressing the final note in the trills. Schellenberger suggests him to play more relaxed.
Afterward, they discuss about the reeds and their differences: the professor recommends the student a reed with which he could "speak" more. Schellenberger also suggests a quicker movement of the tongue so that the attack for each note can be clearer and faster, but always keeping the jaw unmoving. When oboist moves the jaw or mouth, the pressure changes and the sound will not be steady.
The way to play this piece should be more "elastic", and the student should pay attention and listen himself to be aware about his sound quality and be able to correct it when it is not so good. As a conclusion, Hansjorg Schellenberger mentions the specific part of the reed where the pressure must be applied.
At the beginning of the masterclass, Schellenberger makes some comments on phrasing, breathing and dynamics regarding the harmonic structure of the movement. Then he makes other corrections on articulation, tempo, tuning, breathing places, always taking into account the harmonic analysis of the movement, which is quite complex. In Bach's compositions, it is very important to know and show properly the inner structure of the piece.
Throughout his lecture, the professor insists on phrasing related to harmony (diminished sevenths), tempo, etc. The student must emphasize the development of the work. Schellenberger also focuses his corrections on breathing, suitable moments where to do it, and diaphragm involvement in this breathing.
They work again on aspects related to articulation, dynamics, formal analysis for several parts of the Allemande, and how to play with a correct leaps positioning. Finally, the student practices that in front of the mirror.
In this masterclass, Schellenberger starts pointing out the characteristic tempo of this movement: it is faster. He mentions the metrical and tempo differences between Italian or French Courante. Afterwards, the professor underlines the breathing work and the importance of the voices. He also makes some corrections on phrasing, relaxation and better places to breath considering the harmonic structure. Besides, Hansjorg Schellenberger makes comments on mouth and jaw position, support, tuning or articulation, among other musical issues.
The first comment by Prof. Schellenberger about this masterclass is referred to have a good support before playing. He also recommends the student not to press so much the leaps and not to bite the embouchure. After that, Schellenberger makes some indications about phrasing and support involvement in diaphragm related to the attacks. Besides, he comments some musical issues on trills and characteristic tempo for Sarabande, tuning, expressiveness and required character in this piece.
To begin with, Hansjorg Schellenberger talks about the rhythm and the typical tempo of the Bourree anglaise: the accent is always in the first beat. Afterwards, the professor gives other instructions about accents, articulation, mouth position, etc. He asks the student to play it staccato/legato taking care of the tongue position to obtain the required sound. Summarizing, Schellenberger highlights specially the importance of getting and maintaining a good technique in line with the musicality.
The piece is about the story of Romeo and Juliet, and Professor Schellenberger makes a comparison between Prokofiev's ballet and Poulenc's sonata. It is a piece which talks about Love and Dead. Schellenberger gives some examples which prove the relationship between Poulenc's piece with Prokofiev's work, e. g. the first chord of the sonata. He also talks about that character and tempo, as well as the harmonic analysis of the movement. Schellenberger gives a deep explanation about the composer Francis Poulenc and his work.
Other topics covered in the class are phrasing, fingering, dynamics, projection of the sound, contrasts, rhythm accuracy and tempo.
The character of this scherzo is energetic, even "aggressive", in attacks and movements. The piece needs absolute precision in tempo and agogics and more support with the diaphragm.
More aspects in which Professor Schellenberger focuses on are fingerings, dynamics, and staccato. This scherzo is a constant conflict between the oboe and the piano but there are also several moments of reconciliation and encounter, as in the Trio.
First, Professor Schellenberger makes a recommendation about dynamics and sound balance. In this kind of works, it is important to respect all the dynamic indications to understand the performance. The rhythm also must be very clear, and the entries very precise.
Schellenberger also suggests that the beat should be constant and then he insists on 'motif' issues: location, appearance, which instrument has to play them, etc. Finally, there are also particular corrections on accents and articulation.
Professor Hansjorg Schellenberger gives general considerations about the way to play this piece: the beginning is piano; yet, at the same time, the theme has stand out, playing with more freedom during the crescendo. The performance must be lighter in general, with 'swing'.
Professor Schellenberger explains the dynamics of the whole piece, as well as the phrasing and the meaning of each section, and how to feel them. The score accuracy is necessary to read and understand the composer's indications.
The professor compares the work with the architecture and painting of the 'Belle Epoque': the asymmetric elements, the curves, Mahler's music, etc. everything that shaped the 'Art Nouveau'.
Regarding the tempo, in this case it has to be understood as a dance. It is also important to maintain the balance among parts, and the way to achieve it is by listening to the rest of the instruments and distinguishing the most remarkable parts at any time.
There is also a study of pulses in a very complex and rhythmical passage. In spite of the complexity of the rhythm, the professor insists on the importance of keeping the original tempo.
Professor Schellenberger comments that the students have to feel the pulse in 3 and explains how to play the staccato (shorter) depending on the rhythmical elements of the other instruments. The shoulders have to be relaxed while playing. The professor also explains the dynamics of every part in several moments and the waltz rhythm in a specific passage.
At the end of the masterclass, professor Schellenberger explains the most important aspects of the movement: thematic elements, individual dynamics for each instrument - they have to be as exactly as possible for the whole to be clear. There are connections and correspondences among instruments, which is important to take into account - pay attention to canonical moments. Every sound has to be played with projection, with light.
This first part of the masterclass is focused on rapport and sound balance issues. Regarding technique, Professor Schellenberger gives some instructions about sound emission and support, embouchure and mouth position bringing the air to the low part of the abdomen, etc.
Finally, Schellenberger makes some corrections on phrasing and character, among others.
In this second part of the masterclass, Hansjorg Schellenberger focuses on rhythm, metrics and tempo issues. He also points out the voices that have the relevant melodic line in different passages. After some character corrections, Schellenberger gives some indications about articulation, accents, and the length of the notes, among others.
First of all, Hansjorg Schellenberger suggests the student to modify some notes at the end of the piece for a better adaptation, regarding that the original work is for violin. Then, he makes some indications about dynamical rapport between both instruments, phrasing, tempo, when breathing suits better, ornaments, etc.
In this type of music, it must exist a continuous dialog. After a consideration about tuning, professor Schellenberger makes some recommendations about the behavior of the student on stage and his gestures towards the pianist. As a conclusion, Schellenberger mentions that this first Romanza is the most sensitive.
In this masterclass Schellenberger points out the Norwegian character of this Romanza . It remembers him Grieg's music (like trolls in a forest). About the student's performance, the professor indicates that he doesn't play the "pizzicato arpeggio" at the end. He also mentions that the character in certain moment must be more tender, without pressing so much, and he shows it by playing this part. The performance must be lighter in tempo but relaxed, scherzando and fluid.
Afterwards, Schellenberger makes some comments on agogics and tempo changes, proper articulation regarding the right hand in the piano, preparation in the harmonic change, dynamics, and so on.
Schellenberger starts the masterclass making a brief indication about how to articulate taking into account the pizzicati chords passage at the original violin part. Besides, he explains the meaning of this Romanza character referred to a German instruction written in the Alpensinfonie by Richard Strauss : sweet and tender but forceful at the same time.
After the student's performance, the professor makes comments - among other musical issues - about fingerings for the trills, breathing, or preparation to the harmonic change. Schellenberger also suggests playing the trills resolution in the change of tonality. Then he makes some final corrections about dynamics, vibrato and character.
Professor Shellenberger explains the meaning of Adagio in the Baroque period at the beginning of the piece, as well as talks about Bach's ornamentation. Sometimes, the ornamentation refers to the bass line and it is the way to play more 'espressivo'. Schellenberger insists on the expression of every ornament and how they are written on the score, which determines the way of playing. Rhythm is also important to give the correct character of the improvising designs.
The ornamentation before the cadenza should be lighter to give later more importance to the cadenza. It is necessary to feel the vibration more than the note. One final recommendation to the student is to play without stress, but playfully as in the Baroque period.
In this masterclass about oboe technique, Schellenberger proposes several exercises to improve the sound.
The student practices it looking to the mirror and changing the articulation. It is necessary to improve the contact with the embouchure and the creation of the sound.
Another exercise suggested - to practice the attacks - consists on searching for a better position of the embouchure and the more suitable movement of the tongue to get a better sound. The body must remain still and focusing on the pressure. The tuning should be stable, even though the articulation's change (legato/staccato). Besides, it is important to maintain always a good support.
Then, the professor compares the role of the tongue (playing the oboe) with the role of the bow (playing the violin).
To conclude, they work again on the attack regarding the speed of the tongue movement and trying to keep static both the mouth and the jaw.
The student has to "speak" the piece very clearly. Therefore, he has to articulate more from the bow. The professor shows and clarifies the note groups of the phrasing. In this piece, dynamics move at the same time as the tempo.
There are also corrections on portato, sound control - when changing the string -, meaning of "ruhig" (calm) and technical work on double stops. The string change has to be anticipated by the fingers and each interval has its own character and expression. The expression is what sets us in motion and not the metronome.
The professor explains the rhythmical relation between 6 and 4 (sixteenth notes). He wants the student to clarify the changes from major to minor and, in general, to have a deeper connection within the phrase between the climax and either tessitura or character changes.
Finally, some comments on Hindemith's music and his value as a composer.
First, the professor corrects the student's position, the right arm movement and the position of the elbow in relation to the contact point of the bow. He also refers to the position of the fingertips: it is very important that they feel the contact with the bow and use it correctly (which leads to them feeling more contact with the sound).
Then there are some explanations and corrections on shifts, phrasing, relaxation, and sound maintenance without stopping the bow, bow changes and expression.
General comments of the professor: the student lacks strength, projection and clarity of sound, particularly in the second part (Allegro).
Once in the Allegro, the professor recommends to pay attention to the harmony of the piano part, to play the triplets clearer and to think in a singing way rather than "forcing" the sound ("making more pressure does not lead to more sound"). Harmonic changes mean expression changes.
The professor works on articulation, phrasing, tuning, bowings, bow direction, distribution, and dynamics. He also recommends the student to play in a more relaxed way, thus making it easier and enjoying it more. In a certain passage, the colour has to be different, picturing the horn sound. Moreover, the professor proposes different fingerings to give a greater sense of cadenza. Finally, he corrects the tuning of the penultimate chord of the piece to achieve more resonance ("to ring more").
The character of the first movement is similar to a fairy tale, and the professor compares it with Schumann's Dichterliebe cycle. All the musical aspects have to correspond with that character, and that is why a concrete atmosphere is required. On Schumann's original score, it is indicated just one bow for two bars.
The corrections also focus on the right arm movements and the way to play at the beginning - like in backstage (behind the scenes), as the piece comes from nowhere (playing in sotto voce) and grows little by little.
The player has to handle the bow without articulating, like a continuum, and to pay attention to the sound at the end of the upbows - keeping the quality of sound and finishing the whole bow.
The last pizzicato has to be prepared. The professor develops the idea of axis-movement: every movement - both in general and during the performance- turns around an axis. Following this concept, the viola has to stay still in the middle, in a balance.
The professor explains how to play a specific passage and proposes technical exercises - on finger extensions - to get it. The bow has to be close to the string, without jumping.
About phrasing, it is necessary to build the line. They also work on the vibrato in high pitches and on how to avoid accents where there are none - by changing arm gestures to prevent them.
The student has to study the dotted rhythms, as if they where triplets. The articulation and the rhythm in the left hand are also important. About finger position, it is advisable to remove the tension from the fingers after each note, instead of pushing them backwards.
First, Prof. Holl advises the student to sing the theme twice. Then, he makes some corrections about the initial rhythm: both the pianist and the singer should show more freedom and expressiveness. Additionally, Hartmut Holl makes some comments about dynamics and character, among others.
Professor Holl starts the masterclass explaining the character of the piece and giving some corrections on phrasing and articulation. Rubato, tempo, colour and dynamics are also topics to be studied in the class.
He insists on German pronunciation - specifically the vowels - and comments aspects such as phrasing and flexibility in the voice line. He explains the construction of the phrase and the previous preparation required to build it.
Finally, Professor Holl focuses on the expression and the sound through the vowels and the consonants.
In this masterclass, they work on some corrections and topics, such as the character - which should be played with more simplicity -, the tempo, pronunciation and articulation, sound quality in piano part, vowels and consonants, emission, and flexibility.
He also explains the concept of 'opus' and talks about the main theme, which has references to generosity and personal gratitude and needs to be more cantabile and open.
Professor Holl gives some indications to the piano part referring to posture, distribution of energy, character and hand movements.
Regarding the singer, Professor Holl focuses on emission, accents in some moments, breathing, meaning of the text, pronunciation, open sound, and flexibility. He also explains the use of different editions of the score and the body gestures while singing.
In this masterclass, Professor Holl gives general indications related to the main aspects of voice training: pronunciation and projection when performing a phrase. He also advises the student on the need to create her own personality as a singer. The singer has to avoid voice gaps or leaps and rather imagine and create a voice line. General musical aspects such as dynamics, articulation and expression are also present.
As a pianist, Holl gives corrections to the piano part in concepts like character, sound, articulation and dynamics, and makes a comparison with Schubert's music.
Professor Holl makes comments on the piano part related to bass register, different colours, character, dynamics, hand movements, and accents.
He also makes corrections to the singer to improve aspects like emission, pronunciation, expression, body movement, vowels, rhythm, and dynamics. The professor thinks that it is desirable to open the voice in a specific passage and gives the student some ways to study this piece.
In general, the student's performance was too much restrained, and Holl considers that it should be more 'pathetic' and express more feelings depending on the lyrics. After some indications about dynamics and pronunciation, Professor Holl works with the pianist. He also recommends the student to change her corporal position and voice color according to each song.
Afterwards, Prof. Holl works on rhythm and tempo issues and he gives some final indications about the articulation following the words pronunciation.
Professor Holl advises the student to relax herself at the end of a song and to take some time before she starts the next one, so that she gets to the required mental and physical state. Afterwards they work on expressive aspects of the lyrics.
Prof. Holl also mentions some exercises of the Stanislavski Method and then he makes some comments on air emission, dynamics, accents and phrasing, energy and breathing, etc. The key is to create vital situations. Finally, Hartmut Holl insists on what a lied is: a moment in life that must be created in a personal and natural way.
First, Prof. Holl points out that the piano should act more as a backing, without showing too much emotion. Then he talks about the freedom of the performance regarding her personality for the 'chanson' character and he makes a recommendation to the student about this kind of repertoire.
There are some initial corrections on balance, phrasing, and articulation in the piano accompanying part. Hartmut Holl also works with the musicians on issues such as the emotional relationship with the text, color, tempo, German pronunciation, character for the song and dynamics.
The phrasing in this music is very fluent; it is compared with Apres un reve, Op. 7 . The character of Faure's music is like a dream.
Use of the bow: different bowings in specific passages; the start should not be done always at the frog, but also from the middle or from the upper part. Identification of passages where it not advisable to use too much bow. Bowings are similar to air; they should float without pulling too much. Attention to spiccato.
Use of the vibrato: the vibrato should not always have the same level, and neither is it necessary all the time. The professor explains the natural moments where is more advisable to breath, as singing.
Ivry Gitlis congratulates the student for her performance. He also talks about general issues, such as the tempo, phrasing, different voices and their importance; how to work and control the rubato, breathing, and harmony changes and how to practice them.
General indications are mentioned in this class: phrasing, dynamics, tempo, rhythm.
Ivry Gitlis explains how, when the piano part makes a diminuendo, the violin starts in piano. He also does some corrections about the bow: the professor allows the student to use his bow and talks about the characteristics of the student's. He does not need to use such a quantity of bow (not the whole bow), and rather should start the bowings in the middle part.
It is interesting to distinguish the different levels and to move through them. It is also important to control the body to avoid wasting energy. The work has a certain relation with one piece by Debussy. The professor and the student work on the character of a specific passage, animato, and on the highpoint of the movement that is followed by the anticlimax.
Although the student plays well, he could do better. Ivry Gitlis mentions several well-known violinists as an example.
Regarding the Introduction of the work, Gitlis advises to play the first note as pizzicato, since this piece should sound as if someone was walking. It must also be performed in tempo, but not metronomic: it can be done rubato. He later on gives some suggestions on bowings and bow distribution, sound, or metrics, inserting some musical anecdotes.
Gitlis advises the student to use the mute in this movement and makes some reflections about the beginning: to think and mentally prepare the notes before playing. In this matter, he tells an anecdote about his recording of Sibelius' Violin Concerto . Both at the beginning and, in general, in all the entries, the student must take more time.
Perhaps it may help imagining Tchaikovsky entering the room. Violinists are lucky, since they can completely express their feelings with their instrument. She should play freely and without fear, and it must be intimate and melancholic, without being sad. After mentioning Beethoven's Concerto , the professor advises to listen to the harmony and the change of color, and not use too much bow. The student must feel it, and then do it.
Gitlis explains that the parts that are repeated should not be played all the same, and rather be said differently, imagining some kind of echo. He later does some corrections on the phrasing and the distribution and quantity of bow.
Gitlis also advises that the sound should be more prepared and that the performance must be given with love -he mentions Shakespeare and Cervantes, more freely and feeling it: the student needs to free and relax her arm, using her body's own movement and natural weight. He finally adds a brief anecdote about Carl Flesch and adds that the character should be not so gentle or smooth.
I. Rubato: First, Jaime Martin gives some indications about phrasing and articulation (more like "speaking"), syncopation, direction and character. Then they work on the rapport in the ornamental parts, tempo, dynamics, vibrato, and tension.
II. Andante: The Professor suggests that the student should look for a different color in the 'Poco sostenuto' after the 'Andante' introduction: like a violin in the G-string, not too much open, painful. Then he advises the student where is it better to breathe to keep the tension and phrasing.
III. Poco rubato: Professor Martin recommends starting the third movement above the piano resonance of the previous movement, so that the tempo is more suitable, and he plays this beginning to show it to the student.
IV. Andante: Professor Martin shows how to play this piece and then he advises the student about expressiveness and attitude in the performance: it is better to exaggerate than to fall short. Afterwards they work on dynamics, rapport with the piano and character.
This Scherzo is like a bridge between the sad songs and the happy ones. It has a lot of humor, and so Professor Martin advises to be flexible with the tempo in this performance and play it in the Hungarian "Czardas" style. The first three measures are like an introduction and so that they should not be played "a tempo". Afterwards, there are some corrections about dynamics, rhythm, and phrasing at the end of the piece.
VII. Allegro: These pieces are "old dances" and they must sound like folk music, not "pesante". Professor Jaime Martin advises the student to listen to the Tzigane violinist Roby Lakatos and play with a funny and popular character.
VIII. Allegretto: It is advisable to wait a little in the last note, giving a more "Hungarian style". Jaime Martin also suggests playing nonstop between movements. The sound should imitate the violin harmonics.
IX. Allegretto - X. L'istesso tempo: Professor Martin gives tempo indications and he plays both pieces to show it. Next movement also should be played directly "in attacca". Professor Martin also makes comments on character, sound, and how to play the last note to get into the following movement in the right way.
XI. Assai moderato: For this piece, Professor Martin gives some indications about tempo, phrasing and breathing between phrases, making it simpler.
XII. Allegro: The Professor indicates how to play this movement by playing it, and gives a brief comment on tempo.
XV. Allegro: Short remark about the fingering in a fast passage of this last piece.
Professor Saksala explains some bowings and fingerings for this orchestral passage. He also makes some comments about bow distribution and bow direction. In certain passages, the articulation is legato. The fragment is like a canon: it starts with the viola and the violin and goes on with the double bass.
The lecture begins with a brief correction on the attack with the bow (more percussive), the character should be more dramatic and there are other short corrections over the score.
Restarting the piece, Janne Saksala makes indications on the entry, and then on dynamics and natural phrasing. Saksala also suggests some bow and fingering changes to the student so that he could "sing" more. The gesture with the arm should be larger, in line with the expression of the drama. Besides, it is important to make a dynamic and character development, taking into account the climax in piano to touch the soul of the listener. At the end of the slow part, they work on articulation, notes duration and bowings issues.
Referring to the fast part, Professor Saksala gives some pieces of advice regarding the arm movement and bow direction. She should practice it slowly and detache, not spiccato.
Then they focus on a technical issue to improve the movement of the right arm: it is like a double lever between joints (elbow and wrist).
Afterwards they work on musical aspects such as articulation, music direction, sound, dynamics, tempo and bow distribution.
Finally, they practice the end of the piece, which is difficult, slowly but in rhythm and pressing more on the string. Cadence must be...
Professor Saksala comments that it is important to take time differently within passages to get the specific phrasing, not always the same breathing and pause. He gives some indications to the pianist. Continuing with phrasing, the student should pay attention to the most important notes in the phrase and Saksala talks about color and expressive resources to be applied. Bowings (bow changes and use of the bow) are used in relation to the phrasing as well.
Saksala mentions some kind of articulation between the slur and the separated sound. The Professor purposes alternative fingerings that the student should try and chose the best option for him. Saksala makes notes on the score and links with the phrasing and the bowings. In specific phrases, it is important to remark the lowest note and not to rush. On the D string, the student should play a wider bowing to be heard over the orchestra. To play a single note, it is better not to use the D string because that breaks the legato and the sound, so the key is to get the same sound with the fingering adapted to the phrase.
About the character, it is not necessary to play louder if we want to achieve a mysterious atmosphere. Finally, Professor Saksala explains how to work the 'spiccato brillante'.
Professor Saksala suggests to the student to create different atmospheres and more contrasts. The character of the piece is like a lullaby. The best way to start a long sound is with more calm and progression, and with sound projection.
It is also important to work on articulations, vibrato and dynamics related to the phrasing. The bowings should be out of the fingerboard, in the middle of the bridge, to get more resonance.
They talk about the student's instrument and the different tuning for specific notes. Every time we have the same phrase (the same notes or the same melodic design), the repetition should have some different element and not only be played exactly as the first time.
They also talk about the harmonic richness of the piece. Saksala explains the more appropriate place where the bow have to contact with the string and he shows this point to the student.
In general, the phrasing has to be freer. Professor and student work on the note distribution in the bow to give more fluidity to the music. Although the 'rallentando' is a question of personal taste, it is not necessary to be exagerated.
Coming back to the phrasing, in a specific repetition of a phrase, the second time is much more conclusive. They work on the last phrase in aspects such as phrasing,...
In many times, Professor Saksala starts playing to demonstrate in a practical way what he wants the student to do. In general, the Professor works in depth on the phrasing and related issues (important notes, breathing, vibrato in certain passages). Moreover, there is a repeated idea throughout the class: the need to take more time in certain notes, sometimes to give more fantasy or to improve expression.
The student has to project the sound outwards using more bow. In some notes of the phrase it is necessary to give much more emphasis. The student has to 'enter more into the string', more contact is required to get a richer sound. The Professor comments on the need to work on the spiccato: it must be prepared starting from the air, with enough height, as scratching the string. A concrete passage has almost the character of mazurka and another one is more cantabile, the contrast should be shown. At the end, a great accelerando is required.
At the beginning, Saksala suggests the double bass to wait to start until its first cue, so there is time enough for the accompanying piano to fade out. In some moments it is necessary to take more time to express more fantasy (this idea comes out in many moments of the class). The Professor works in depth on the phrasing, the most important notes to be highlighted, the moment to breath to express more and the use of vibrato in certain passages.
Professor Saksala suggests not pushing and lengthening a note so much, there is a comma, a breathing. They discuss about phrasing and articulation for this orchestral passage and the Professor plays it to show the correct way. For a proper tuning, he advises the student to play from the D-A base, recording himself.
At the beginning of the masterclass, Professor Saksala comments on several changes that the composer introduced after the publication of the score. He plays several passages of the Divertimento to show the student some aspects, such as dynamics, attacks and bow strokes and articulation. Some passages have to sound more fluid. When there are several notes on the same bow, it is better to give them more weight. There are two types of string changes: fast and slow, the slow change comes from the shoulder and the fast one from the forearm (elbow rotation is needed). They work on both changes very slowly, so that the student assimilates each movement of his body. Saksala comments about Nino Rota . The student should maintain a correct head position while playing.
The Professor proposes changes of fingerings in several passages and different bowings. He talks about the appropriate moments to use martele and how to do it. Saksala writes annotations on the score about slurs, upbeats and articulations. The energy should be rationed from the start to the finish of the piece.
Professor Saksala corrects on the fly some questions of articulation. At the end of the performance, he talks about the better tempo. He suggests to the student to use little bowings, that way the articulation will be clearer. Then they comment about an indication on the score that says "on the frog" and Saksala shows the student how to play it and indicates the most convenient bow stroke. Finally, he insists on the duration of some notes and articulation.
Indications about the bass (left hand) and the use of the pedal. "Italian" character, not serious. Phrasing and tempi issues. A particular passage requires sforzando. Advice about the rubati and the use of metrical freedom like in a Chopin Concerto .
Corrections on tempo and pedal. Importance of the melodic line: not to accent some specific passages. Calando and phrasing. It is better to use Urtext edition in order to know exactly if the score remarks are original from Mozart or not.
Professor Silverstein begins this masterclass with some explanations about playing on the beat and not before the beat, because in this way the chords would be divided. Joseph Silverstein shows it by playing and he points out that fingers should be placed sooner. He also plays the first measures from the Fugue (second movement).
Afterwards, they talk about the tempo: it is related to the movement between one harmony and the next one. Professor Silverstein also makes some indications about attacks, sound preparation, metrics and phrasing, among others.
Firstly, Professor Silverstein makes some introductory comments about bow direction: it is not necessary to play chords always down-bow. For example, his students practice this by playing the Etude Op. 35 No. 1 by Jakob Dont .
Prof. Silverstein also mentions that it is interesting to play with a baroque violin and then he makes some suggestions regarding bow issues, such as bow strokes and direction.
Afterwards, they work on fingering, metrics, shifts or changes of position, chords, strings and character.
Finally, the professor makes some considerations on the way of performing baroque works: he speaks about the historicist musical performances and the baroque instruments. Nowadays, the dynamical rank is bigger. It is necessary also taking into account the invention of the chin rest and its importance for the vibrato. As an example, Joseph Silverstein plays a fragment from the Courante of the Partita No. 2, BWV 1004 by J.S. Bach . To conclude, the professor recommends the student playing with a baroque bow to feel the difference.
To begin with, Professor Silverstein checks the starting sforzandi regarding its character and dynamics. Joseph Silverstein advises the student not to move the bow so quickly for saving it until the end of certain phrase.
Besides, Prof. Silverstein makes suggestions about the appropriate bow-stroke to imitate the piano articulation, and about the best fingering to get the required color.
Finally, the professor reflects on the coda and how it should be performed according to the composition style for this specific musical period: the student should transmit the contrast and expectation which the composer wanted to obtain.
In this masterclass, Professor Silverstein makes some initial corrections on bow-strokes, bow distribution, phrasing and relevance of specific notes regarding harmony, etc. He also recommends the student not to rush in a certain passage, having more conversation with the piano. The student must also show the 'happiest and humorous Beethoven ' in this Sonata .
Afterwards, Silverstein suggests not to do too much ritenuto at the end of the movement, considering the cheerful character of this piece.
To conclude, Silverstein makes a general comment on sforzando piano in early Beethoven, and how it should be performed using an expressive accent. He also comments the difference between this sforzando piano and the fortepiano at the beginning of the movement.
Prof. Steffens begins his lecture pointing out the character for this movement and the suitable phrasing to get this "Grazioso" character, almost in one. After some more brief comments about phrasing, he suggests playing a passage with more vibrato to turn it into a more exciting one. Steffens associates a specific piano part to the Aaron Copland style or even Hindemith , and the period when Bernstein composed this piece which is aligned with West Side Story . Then Prof. Steffens makes some comments on rapport (like a duet), phrasing and articulation.
Afterwards, it is advisable to play a certain passage with another color in the low notes to get the required seriousness for this moment. They make more comments on Leonard Bernstein and his preference for harmonic transitions: the student should entertain himself and underline more these points (a small crescendo in the long note of the phrase could help to get this). Finally, the professor highlights the relevance of the rapport between piano and clarinet.
Just at the beginning of the movement, Prof. Steffens resembles the clarinet melody with a main theme from West Side Story : "Someday, somewhere", it has to sound very sad. About the "mezzoforte espressivo", the professor makes some dynamical instructions to perform that correctly. In a certain moment, the piano should imitate the clarinet articulation "molto legato" to establish better the main character.
Steffens also gives some agogic indications, and about the character at the end of the Andantino just before the Vivace part, which must have more "swing" - in Bernstein's style, not Stravinsky - although further on, articulation is shorter and measured.
They work on the changes to get the required different articulations: this music, like jazz, has a lot of different colors to show (maracas, percussions). Such as the first movement, this one is related again with Aaron Copland and West Side Story atmosphere. In the Lento part, they work basically on agogic and dynamic issues. They also talk about the rapport between both instruments (in tempo, dynamic and articulation aspects). Finally, there are some suggestions about the accents and articulation for the clarinet final notes, and other short general recommendations for the concert.
Karl-heinz Steffen corrects the student some issues about the piece agogics and tempo.
Karl-Heinz Steffens also makes some comments about the character and expressiveness, the articulation on some passages, the length of the pauses and the notes; as well as about the tempo indications on the score.
The work on this piece is focused on the rhythm and tempo. Karl-Heinz Steffens compares this piece with the cubism in Picasso's paintings, and highlights the importance of achieving well-formed music. He mentions the author and talks about just doing what is written in the score, with no personal additions or rhythmic fluctuations. The professor also does some corrections on the length of the notes and the appoggiaturas, the termination of sound, tuning, dynamics, articulations, expressiveness, etc.
The character must be as that of his work The Rite of Spring . The student must play with rigor and rhythmic clarity, keeping the air under control. The professor suggests some 'legato exercises' to train the air release during the final high notes and the jump from a bass to a high note: use more air and less pressure on the embouchure, and lay on the high notes without fear.
Finally, Karl-Heinz Steffens advises the student to try to relax, the more difficult and quick the music is, the more the performer should be calm thinking slowly and with control. It is important to anticipate and think calmly during the difficult passages.
With this piece, Karl-Heinz Steffens and student work on aspects such as the length and accuracy of certain notes specifically, of appoggiaturas and ornaments.
The professor comments on the tempo, the color, the kind of sound, and the sound contrast. Additionally, he points out some dynamic, rhythmic, articulation and accent corrections on different notes. Generally, the performance must have more metric rigor, without rushing, and the character must be more giocoso .
Professor Thunemann works in detail on the rhythm of this Sarabande , as well as on aspects such as tuning and agogics. He comments that accents in phrasing should be in twos and the 'arpeggios' can be played calmer. It is very important to pay attention not only to the notes but to the intention.
About articulation, sometimes it is not necessary to separate the notes, but to connect them. Finally, within a phrasing, it is better to go to the pitch directly, with decision, and not searching it.
At the beginning, Professor Thunemann describes and plays what a Menuet is: a dance in 3/4 pattern. The second beat is not so long. Later he corrects some passages in aspects such as articulation, accents and phrasing. The character of the minor Menuet changes in relation to the beginning.
Thunemann plays and explains some different articulations - separated or legato -, which should be clearer. The phrasing is formed by a longer line, which should be kept. He explains some formal aspects, as the appendix at the end of the phrase.
Thunemann begins his masterclass correcting the bassoon's rhythm for this orchestral excerpt. The rhythmical accuracy is important, and the student must provide the correct duration for each note. Besides, articulation should be different, and he compares it with certain passage from Beethoven's 4th Symphony .
After that, the student should play rallentando, and then Thunemann corrects other rhythmical issues, dynamical or about articulation.
To finish with, Prof. Thunemann advises her to practice the octaves part and to study always by heart the most important parts from these types of orchestral excerpts.
At the beginning of the masterclass, Professor Thunemann says that the student's sound vibrates too much, so the emission has to be more solid. Regarding the indications on the score, the student has to pay attention to the value of the notes, rhythms, and tempo - not rushing, and leave more space between every note in the staccato.
The professor also corrects the tuning in several notes and comments that it is necessary to change the reed for the high F.
The staccato is with more tongue, shorter and with more character. Regarding the dynamics, the crescendo is not so subito. Thunemann insists on not rushing the tempo and taking time in several moments, without rallentando in the final part.
When we have two similar rhythmical structures, the performance of the first structure must be slower than the performance of the second one.
Professor Thunemann gives some advice related to the phrase structure at the beginning of the piece. He makes some corrections on several notes, dynamics, breathing and rhythm.
The professor transmits to the student the need to have a meticulous respect to the score accuracy. He comments the specific legato in a passage and gives some indications on vibrato to be followed by the students: French music has to be performed with more vibrato in high pitches.
Regarding the tempo, it is necessary to play more fluent, trying not to slow down.
Prof. Thunemann begins the masterclass noting that, regarding the tempo, the students must play thinking in the biggest unit, not in the smallest one. Even though the tempo is Largo, it is in 4 (not in 8 or 16), otherwise the music becomes very boring. The bass line provides the tempo.
Besides, the professor gives other musical indications about phrasing, rhythm and articulation, and he insists on the importance of improving the tempo for their performance.
The professor begins this masterclass pointing out that the tempo is "alla breve", and he shows it by playing how the figuration for the bass line should be, the typical for this period and more elegant and independent. Moreover, Thunemann corrects some notes from the edition in relation to the original manuscript. Finally, Klaus Thunemann advises them to make more contrast between the different characters in order to obtain more variety and interest, and he corrects the articulation in a certain passage so they could get more clarity.
In this masterclass, Professor Thunemann corrects issues related to breathing, dynamics and phrasing and he also comments that the first notes of the piece should be more staccato.
Thunemann plays during the class in many occasions to show the best fingerings to the student and the best way to solve certain passages and the most complicated sound effects. Moreover, he works on sound balance between the two bassoon parts. Referring to tempo, Professor Thunemann explains the passages with stricter tempo in contrast with freer passages and corrects the mouth position.
In this contemporary music the performer must constantly control with their ear how to play, because it is not all written as in a book.
At the beginning of the masterclass, Professor Thunemann makes some corrections on vibration and phrasing, breathing or dynamics related to the Recitativo (part A of the first movement) from this Jolivet's Bassoon Concerto . They work also on trills, rhythm and contrasts.
About the Allegro gioviale (part B of this first movement), Professor Thunemann makes some indications on rhythm and dynamical contrast. Especially, Prof. Thunemann stresses the importance on articulation and duration for the notes of this part B. Besides, they work on phrasing and character. About the tempo, the metronome should be at 104 to be able to understand this piece. Finally, Klaus Thunemann focuses on the syncopation to get the required 'jazzy' character.
Klaus Thunemann begins the lecture with a correction related to the ornamentation (grupetto). He corrects also the mouth position with the embrouchure so that this one doesn't go down and neither closes the reed. The most important thing is the air, so she must control it properly.
The professor makes also comments on other musical issues such as the tempo, phrasing, dynamics, pulse maintenance, sound quality or expression in the trill. Moreover, Thunemann insists on matters related to the reed. Then they work on breathing, articulation and rhythm, and on the character (don't play too much wellness). In a certain section with scales, the notes must be played more equally and taking care of the tuning.
Finally, regarding a student's question on her sound, Thunemann advises her not to press so much the reed but play freer. He tests her bassoon and they comments on its tuning and how to avoid "ugly sounds".
Klaus Thunemann begins making some comments about the rapport in the initial entry and the tempo, as well as the tuning and sound clarity. Besides, he gives some indications to the quintet members regarding the articulation, dynamic contrasts, agogics, voices interpretation and conversation. Instead of accelerating the tempo, it should become more flexible.
Professor Thuneman also makes some comments about appoggiaturas, dynamics, and phrasing; and he insists on the voices entries - be careful with it and practice each voice separately. Finally, he makes a brief comment on the general character of this music.
At the beginning of the piece, Professor Thunemann advises to mark clearly the difference among sforzato-piano y forte-piano and it is necessary not to rush the scales.
The clarinet must play lighter and the oboe and the rest of the octet have to play every sound more articulated.
In different moments of the piece, the octet tends to rush the tempo, and Thunemann insists on the importance of keeping the same pulse. There are some important notes to remark the harmonic changes: for example the D note in bassoon part (bar 95). The Professor also explains how to breathe after the fermata, playing a short and clear attack.
As a group, the students have to find the balance in every sound and every instrumental part and play the tutti quicker, going ahead. Sometimes, the oboe has to lead as a conductor to play the cues all together, they have to get breathing together.
At the end of the masterclass, they work on the short notes in the horn part and on the final passage, which is "quasi senza ritenuto".
In this second movement of the Serenade, Professor Thunemann gives some indications about tempo, dynamics, articulation and character: the pulse must be interiorised in one beat; the dynamics are growing step by step, without abrupt changes. The fortepiano is almost a sostenuto; in the horn part, the notes must be played more articulated, more separated.
Talking about phrasing, Thunemann says that, before a new theme appears, it is recommended pausing, the idea is to emphasize the new material.
In general, the phrasing of the movement needs more direction and the students have to play with more energy.
At the end of the masterclass, Thunemann comments that the beginning of the Menuetto in the Da Capo part is played in a different way, in relation to the first time. So it is necessary to unify both of them. The character is more animato, with more energy, and as the third beat comes too late it sounds a little tired). The phrasing in the second part of the Menuetto has more direction for continuing in the following bar. Because of that, it is better if the students play it play it with more intention.
The class begins working on the instrumental part of the accompaniment: the pulse must be "alla breve", the trill is very short and played from the upper note (D).
This third movement is Adagio , so the tempo is calmer. In a certain passage, the notes should not be so short and the sforzato must be clearer.
The first clarinet has a role of soloist and has to stand out more in the dynamic aspect. On the contrary, the oboe and the rest of the octet must play softer, in piano, but with clearer articulation. As a conclusion, the students should play "aufspielen" (with more intention) during the whole movement.
The style for this orchestral excerpt should be more elegant and serious, because it represents an old man, the grandfather. It must not be so jazzy and rhythm must be precise and energic, with "pesante" character.
To pass an audition successfully, Klaus Thunemann advises the student to perform it with much seriousness referred to the expression, and to study also the rhythm and tuning with much more precision. Finally, as an example about the rhythm required in a certain moment, the professor plays a fragment from the Ravel's Bolero .
Professor Thunemann works on articulation, tempo, and accuracy at the beginning of the piece. He also gives indications about dynamics and works on specific voices, such as the flute (which must take more time).
Other corrections are related to triplets, waltz rhythm, ways of facing the reprise, contrasts, character 'sforzando misterioso', pizzicato and tempo. The students should play with more flexibility, rather than being strict. They should also pay attention to the tuning and the rapport among the parts at the end.
At the beginning of the masterclass, Klaus Thunemann corrects the tempo (the students have played it too fast) as well as the flute articulation. Afterwards, the professor makes some indications about the convenience to breathe in a certain moment and about the accents in on the bassoon. The duet must show the dancing and Latin character of this piece, and to achieve that Thunemann suggests a more suitable rhythm and articulation.
Besides, he makes other recommendations on expressiveness, dynamics, articulation and accents. He also corrects the fingering on the bassoon for the end of the piece.
Finally, Prof. Thunemann proposes to play again the Aria taking into account that it is music "on the street". They must wait in the first A and play with a full sound. If it is possible, flutist should play the first phrase in one breath, and then Thunemann makes some specific indications on tempo for both instruments.
Klaus Thunemann begins making a comment about the difficulty of turning the page between movements. The character is dancing and light (related to articulation). Then Thunemann makes comments about tuning.
Regarding the phrasing, Fantasia implies an introduction, like a cadence. Afterwards they work on accents and breathing issues.
Regarding the rhythm and the tempi, Professor Thunemann makes also some suggestions and then he focuses on the rapport: it is important to breathe together. Furthermore, they work on musical aspects related to articulations and dynamics and they look over the end of the movement.
Professor Thunemann recommends the student to start every day with some exercises in the same key that the piece he is going to work on. Thunemann shows the student some examples and they practice them.
In this masterclass, Prof. Thunemann proposes the student different exercises based on scales and arpeggios. First, they practice the C Minor scale regarding the air control and its proportion.
Thunemann mentions trumpetist Dizzy Gillespie in relation to the amount of air in the mouth, and then they work on the support and breathing while playing this scale. The student practices it several times faster and legato.
Afterwards, Thunemann suggests the student to play different arpeggios, correcting its tuning. Finally, the professor mentions some issues referred to registers and embouchure.
At the beginning of this masterclass, Professor Blacher works on the cadenza and the final section of the movement with the student, regarding issues such as fingerings, shifting, bow speed, phrasing, articulation, expression, contrast, and character. He explains the student how to use the bow and how to practice a specific passage. All the cues are important in a concerto and they must be foreseen and breathed. He mentions what the orchestra is playing in some moments.
The student has to differentiate among dynamics and has to play the trills with accent. Later, they work on the development of the movement in some specific passages. Professor Blacher also talks about vibrato, score accuracy, and harmonic tension. Regarding the technical chapter with exercises, these are focused on standing and placement while playing. It is necessary to exercise them daily, e.g. by working on one position, moving the head and raising it. Afterwards, both the Professor and the student keep working on scales and body movements for comfort and extra control.
At the beginning of the masterclass, Professor Blacher advises the student to pay attention to the form and thematic material of the composition: first part looks like an improvisation, so it should be played with more freedom in metrics. There is a sequence: syncopation requires more tension, and triplets should be played accelerando to the climax.
Kolja Blacher also recommends paying more attention to the harmony, because dynamics and color depends on these aspects. Afterwards, Prof. Blacher corrects the student some issues about agogics and tempo, rhythm and hemiola, character and melodic line. It is very important to consider the orchestral part so that the performance has musical sense. Besides, the student should emphasize the main melody.
Blacher also explains the meaning of rubato, among other questions. To conclude, the professor advises the student to analyze the score - not just her violin part - to get a more exciting performance.
Professor Blacher explains aspects about bow technique: the bow comes more 'from the string', with more weight. The student has to make a clear difference between when he plays staccato (less bow) and when he uses more bow. In any case, the staccato should not be so close to the frog. The student has to turn the bow to avoid sounding 'col legno'. If we want to get a 'flautato' colour, the bowing should be lighter, without weight and with the whole bow.
For the left hand, Professor Blacher gives some indications to the student: he explains how tuning works in Milstein and Perlman . The student must search for the feeling of relaxation in fast passages for the left hand. Professor Bacher also talks about harmonic glissando and he explains several corrections about the position of the violin - too closed because of the chinrest; opening the position means to get more sound).
Related to the bow, Professor Blacher proposes some technical questions: sound exercises in open strings holding the sound, the right elbow and the wrist. They use Kreutzer's Etude No. 2 (Allegro moderato, from '42 Etudes') to work on bow and sound, taking into account different kind of sound if the bow places at the frog or at the tip.
Blacher also mentions the method "The Dounis Violin Players'...
In this masterclass, Professor Blacher believes that the piece needs more contrast in general. The student must think in different orchestral colors, e.g. the beginning as trumpets. Moreover, Blacher comments the possibility to change the character using the articulation in a different way (contrast legato-spiccato).
Kolja Blacher explains the meaning of a cadenza: it is the moment where the artists shows their potential and must play as improvising, creating a surprise for the audience (it involves an attitude as a real musician) and breathing and giving more space to the music, more breaks. Tempo must be in relation to the interest of the musical ideas (e.g. going faster in simple passages). They talk about the original cadenza from Beethoven's Violin Concerto .
Finally, Kolja Blacher recommends to the student not to pay attention to the different editions but always considering the general score.
Other topics explained in this masterclass are phrasing, bowings, dynamics and sound levels, style, articulation.
First of all, Professor Blacher corrects the desynchronization between violin and piano in the transition from Largo to Allegro. Tempo in Largo part is too slow and it is more advisable to think the pulse "alla breve".
Kolja Blacher's general recommendation is that every note must be more articulated because in a large hall the articulation is hardly distinguished.
He gives other suggestions and indications to the student: sforzato must be played using half bow for the first note; about ornamentation, the grupetto is played in the first beat.
Finally, Blacher talks about Mozart's expressiveness, very different to Tchaikovsky's .
At the beginning of the masterclass, Professor Blacher comments about sound clarity, and then they work on shifts and bow distribution, spiccato, and the relocation of the right arm to get a better sound.
He recommends color changes about the piano dynamics and, after that, they review the tuning and sound quality in certain difficult passages.
It is important that the student knows the harmonies is playing in order to be tuned with the piano. They also work on issues related to double stops, right hand and bow movement, etc.
Regarding the cadence, Professor Blacher suggests some string changes and other aspects of the student's execution.
In this technical masterclass, Professor Kolja Blacher suggests to the student an exercise to improve the vibrato, in order to reach a wider and more controlled vibrato. The student practices this with a passage from the Violin Concerto No. 1 by Paganini .
Afterwards, Professor Blacher proposes some exercises to achieve better sound when the student plays with the tip of the bow. Besides, the student makes an exercise based on scales, so she could lift properly the fingers, and therefore to be able to improve the shifts and the string changes.
Finally, Professor Blacher recommends another additional exercise to improve the vibrato and they work on it.
Professor Kolja Blacher works with the student the first movement of Ysaye's Violin Sonata No. 4 , giving instructions about the speed of the vibrato depending on the nature of the passage, the bow's strokes, speed and changes taking into account the dynamics and character (more or less energetic), tension and double cords.
In the end, the professor gives the student some advice on how to train the vibrato: think about in which register may vibrate more or less, and which bowings need more or less energy, as well as the importance of training it slowly.
First, Professor Melrose suggests the student to think about someone he loves a lot, and try to sing for him/her. The idea is to find the proper emotional state to perform this aria. They also work on phrasing and breathing in several passages. In one of them, after a great intake of breath, the student should hold back the air while delaying the moment to continue singing. In this same passage, it is especially important the connection and rapport with the piano.
The student must pay attention to the text and the articulation, according to the character and the emotion being described. He should not forget the expression in any passage. Professor Melrose explains that, when a high pitch is repeated, the support has to be kept, instead of rising and falling continuously. Tuning is also worked in certain moments. Finally, Professor Melrose suggests maintaining the attitude until the end of the aria to create a powerful conclusion.
At the beginning of this masterclass, Professor Melrose focuses on the performance of the Count's character and on the expression of this role. The first three phrases represent three different thoughts with three different colors. It is very important to be aware of the text and its expressiveness. Professor Melrose indicates which words have to be highlighted from the more trivial ones, due to their importance when expressing the Count's mood - rough and coarse.
Professor Melrose explains the interpretation and expression required for this aria. Special care should be taken in the solemn passage. Another fragment has to be articulated as a dance. Professor Melrose insists on the importance of paying attention to the text and its expressiveness, underlining the significance of certain words. He also explains to the student how to express changes in this character's thinking, as well as how to use the energy when the passage requires more vigour.
First, they talk about the story line for of this opera and its expressive implications. The simplest is always the best. Afterwards, Professor Melrose makes some comments on phrasing regarding the lyrics, and he recommends the student to bear these thoughts in mind in order to activate the specific feeling.
He then highlights the importance of some moments according to the tension implied in the text: it is necessary to keep the tension with the public in order to maintain the interest.
Professor Melrose also thinks that the intensity mainly depends on the way we feel the words, rather than on the volume, which means that it is important to sing with a special color. Moreoer, Professor Melrose advises not to sing "like a singer" but like a "normal human being".
Professor Melrose comments with the student the character of this scene and they describe the role of Aldimira and the best way to express her mood. He then corrects the entrance: it is better not to hurry up, enjoying the previous silence. Afterwards, Professor Melrose makes some comments on expressiveness and color regarding the feelings of the opera character. They also work on the role portrayal and on the performance of the scene that she is singing. Finally, there are some indications about the text and pronunciation, the accents and phrasing - regarding what the singer is saying; and about breathing, among others.
For this Cavatina, they mainly work on breathing and phrasing issues. Professor Melrose also makes some corrections on dynamics, pronunciation, expressiveness and staging regarding the libretto. It is necessary keep the energy and the breath as steady as possible to ensure that the music flows.
Afterwards, they work on the role portrayal and the Professor corrects the air emission at the beginning of the song. Additionally, they go over the climax of the Cavatina so that the student gathers all the energy needed in this part - according to the Professor, to achieve this the student should take more time to prepare the moment and should also take a deeper breath.
Professor Melrose tells the student to allow the energy to enter his body. They work on the breathing of the first cue. The student needs more focus and more concentration of sound, as if the air were a laser.
Professor Melrose explains that the sound projection does not imply to push the voice and that the phrasing always depends on the text.
They also work on body relaxation, maintaining the support without bending de body backwards.
Regarding the attitude, the student must trust himself. The relaxation and the rest of the muscles are very important to get a relaxed pitch and they help to make the vowels softer. There should be no rush in the word 'corona' and the student should maintain the exclamations in the final phrases until the end.
First, Professor Leigh Melrose points out that the student should hold the first phrase. They then talk about expressiveness and about how to better show the character's emotional moment in this aria. Afterwards, they work on phrasing and on the pronunciation of some words. In general, Professor Melrose advises the student to be more open. At the end of the masterclass, the student asks a technical question to improve the control of the tongue and Professor Melrose recommends him to maintain the mouth as relaxed as possible. It could be useful to practice in front of the mirror but without getting obsessed or feeling inhibited about this issue.
It is better to use more pressure in the bow to get a great quality of sound. Maazel advices specific fingerings. In a passage in detache-marcato, it is advisable to use the whole bow. Preparation to second theme, concrete bow attacks (more speed and accuracy).
Introduction: sound and violin types. Sound quality at the beginning of the piece; the vibrato has to be more expressive and coming from the arm. Indications about tempo.
Corrections in bow weight distribution: more quantity, more air. About tuning: necessary to listen to the orchestra part as a reference.
Also indications about pizzicato: finger vibration to achieve a great quality sound. Mute: in high registers, place the mute on the opposite side of the bridge to get a good sound; on d string, change the place to the other side.
General considerations about bowing: comments about position, inclination and contact point. It is better to combine bow pressure with finger pressure on each note in a specific passage. Also indications about bowing use in lyrical passages.
Pitch duration in a certain passage: do not play too quick for nor losing the break sensation.
Finger placing: flat position on the string, more necessary in fast passages to get a better quality of sound. In a specific passage, more metric accuracy to obtain a kinder character. Also indications about phrasing, tuning and absolute hearing. For a better vibrato more use of the arm.
Indications about voice identification: be aware of the clarity of the B natural in a G Major chord. Also working on tuning and violin positions and phrasing. The professor advices about bow changes in a specific passage to get better sound quality.
When the student finishes his performance, Professor Rizzi plays again the Allemande to show him the way to address this movement. They also talks about vibrato articulation and character. Referring to some notes, it is convenient to take more time in order to establish the sound. The dotted notes are not so nervous, they are very strict in time but comfortable. Rizzi explains some aspects such as maintenance of the sound within the phrasing and depth of some bass pitches. The triplets have to sound as "breaking the rules", with some provocation and they are strictly in time.
Referring to the form, the first part of the Allemande does not conclude completely, but it has a continuity in the second half.
Professor Rizzi talks about the character of this movement and gives some indications to the student in order to clarify the rhythm, the counterpoint and the rubato.
When it comes to the character, it should be played with more continuity, enjoying, and more comfortable way, and not losing that intention throughout the movement.
When there is a change of rhythm, for example from dotted notes to others, the change should be done immediately, while the cue to the repetition is more delicate, trying the more adequate contact point of the bow. The student should be aware of the internal counterpoint of the melody because there are two voices. In the moment where rubato appears, it is necessary to keep the flow.
Professor Rizzi talks about Bach and Baroque music. It is very important to pay attention to all the hints that Bach gives in the score: slurs, articulations, etc. Although we have the idea that Baroque music is a very structured and logic style, we should avoid rigidity and severity within the form. The student has to distinguish between long and short lines with the phrasing.
The Professor asks the student if he knows other pieces or movements in which Bach uses the same melodic turns. The character is a little rude and the student plays too carefully. We have always to keep the flow while playing.
Talking about phrasing, there are different possibilities when we have 6 notes, e.g. 1-2-2-1. In other passages, the phrase should be organized in pairs.
First, Pressler tells an anecdote with violinist Henri Temianka (Paganini Quartet) about tuning. Then he focuses on the sound quality, giving some indications about sound balance and level (less piano and more violin), sound clarity, dynamics, alternated with other corrections on the tempo and the violin's vibrato.
Continuation of the masterclass about the first movement of Beethoven's Piano Trio op.1/3 , where Pressler gives some advice to the trio members regarding phrasing, dynamics, voices, articulation, character, agogics, harmony, and vibrato, among others.
The professor congratulates the students and talks about the quality of the piece. On the other hand, it is necessary to improve some aspects, such as the correct tempo, the piano melody, syncopations, accuracy of the entrances, bow technique in strings, character in certain moments, trills, articulation, interpenetration among the instruments, and solo moments.
The corrections are about bow strokes, dynamics and phrasing. It is also advisable not to lengthen the last note of each phrase and to clarify the articulation, which is softer. The piano should not stand out there should be a balance among the three parts and they must pay attention to the voice imitations.
There are other comments on harmony, rhythm, and tempo, and some details explained about the piano part. The group has to be aware of the moment when the cello needs extra time on the high note of the solo, so that they all can rapport together.
Introduction by Professor Pressler , who has played several works by Cesar Franck but never this one. He then makes some corrections on phrasing and dynamics - such as the beginning of violin I part, the piano part, etc. The students have to be aware of the melodic lines and of issues concerning the balance of the sound among the five instruments.
Professor Pressler explains a rhythmic motif in a certain passage of the piano part. He asks the ensemble to identify all the voices and explains some issues regarding the agogics (accelerandi, ritardandi), the pulse and the anacrusis.
With respect to the phrasing, he remarks the notes that should be emphasized in the phrase due to their melodic relevance.
Professor Pressler begins this masterclass with a correction on tempo: it must be largo, much slower (he sings a fragment to show the tempo to the students). Then Professor Pressler corrects the pianist on fingerings and articulation in a specific phrase. Once the performance of the whole movement is over, Professor Pressler focuses on the cello and on how to improve the sound of an interval leap in a final melody. He also gives indications about the way to play pizzicato in a certain passage.
Professor Pressler gives some quick indications and corrections during the students' performance. Afterwards, he also talks about sound volume in violin II, as well as dynamics and sound balance for the whole ensemble.
Finally, apart from the piece they are working on, Professor Pressler completes his explanations with general comments about musicians and members of different quartets.
The professor starts by indicating that some dynamical and sound issues are not Mozart . He also makes some corrections about the phrasing, dynamics, harmonic aspects, character, articulation, and breathing of certain passages.
Then, Pressler indicates other works composed by Mozart and makes more suggestions about the pedal, the tension in the accords and the attacks, among others. Finally, he advises the students to change the dynamics and general attitude regarding the style of the composer.
Comments about Mozart's sound with practical examples and explanations about the tactile sensation. Lightness and beauty of sound in Mozart.
Other considerations: the professor talks about tempo without rushing, comparison between speech and musical accents (always emphasizing the right syllable); breathings, phrasing direction and analysis to distinguish between relevant notes and ornaments; accents and dynamic corrections; care of the scales and consideration about style; how to use the metronome and a studio recording as a support for daily study.
At the beginning of the masterclass, Professor Pressler congratulates the two pianists for their performance. He talks about Rachmaninov's four-hand writing: in this piece, it seems that the piano II does not develop its virtuosism as usual. By contrast, the composer works on two-piano pieces in different ways, both parts (piano I and piano II) are more balanced.
The tempo meno mosso indicates a softer character, an entertainment purpose. They work on the progressions of dynamics to the pianissimo so that they become more gradual.
Corrections on the tempo, phrasing, dynamics, compensation and sound balance regarding the second movement of Ravel's Piano Trio .
Additionally, the professor talks about the harmony of a certain passage, the location of the climax, articulation, character. In relation with the piano, he points out some aspects related to the left hand triplets, rhythm and use of the pedal. He also makes some comments on the color and timbre of the sound, the control of bass notes and the rapport.
The professor begins giving some advice to the violinist on the position and the harmonics. Additionally, he makes general corrections on the last movement of Ravel's Piano Trio related to several rhythmic, dynamic, phrasing, sound and character aspects, among others.
Pressler also talks about the accents and the harmony of certain passages, triplets, agogics and tempo, vibrato, compensations and sound balance.
The professor talks about the comparison between the orchestral and two piano versions in relation to intensity and timbre: tension-relaxation, direction, climax and tempo. Reference to Horowitz's performances.
Other explanations to take into account are phrasing (feeling each phrase), pulse, dynamics, tempo accuracy, use of pedals (damper pedal), articulation, glissando (phrasing and dynamics), accents, sound quality, and timbre. The character must be gentler and not so eccentric. The phrasing has to be well built and the harmony, heartfelt. Finally, the student should work on an expressive sound and the end should be more conclusive.
First, Professor Menahem Pressler mentions that, in general, the piano sounds too loud. He also explains other issues about main voices, sound balance and rapport as group. Then, Professor Pressler makes some general comments on this work, and he talks about the other movements where cello has the principal role. He also makes a comparison with other composers and gives indications about playing the first chord together, phrasing, sound balance, and other rapport issues. They also work on corrections in accents, cello slides in a certain passage, and agogics. Finally, Professor Pressler encourages them to play always with conviction.
Professor Menahem Pressler makes some brief corrections on the second movement of Schumann's Piano Trio No. 2 : First, he talks about the melodic lines for each instrument and their connections, and then, regarding other passage, he recommends the strings to slide down in a specific interval.
Professor Pressler finds a reference to Clara Schumann in a certain melody of this movement. He also talks about expressiveness and he describes and compares a passage with a church where an organ is playing.
Menahem Pressler begins highlighting the difference regarding the sound power and balance that must exist between this work by Tchaikovsky (where the performers must have an equitable treatment) and his concertos (with a soloist character).
Pressler explains how to perform and transmit feelings through this work. He also gives some advice on other aspects, such as articulation and phrasing, tempo, vibrato, rhythm, and the clarity of sound in the solos; as well as on the differentiation in certain passages between the soloist and the orchestral tutti.
Continuation of the class about the first movement of Tchaikovsky's Piano Trio, Op. 50 , where Menahem Pressler gives some indication to the Trio members regarding the dynamical contrasts, sound clarity, arpeggios, articulation, fingerings, rhythmical and dancing character, accents, entries, etc.
The movement is Adagio in 4 , not in sixteenth notes, which would make it too slow and heavy. Professor and student talk about the function of the movement in the whole sonata and the purpose of the ornamentation, as well as about phrasing, character, articulation in legato, use of right arm, vibrato - not in every note -, tension - relaxation of the harmony, pulse, articulation in left hand, and dynamics. In some specific passages, it is also possible to changes bowings.
Professor Fried starts the masterclass asking about the primary character for this movement: it is dramatic, so the sound quality should describe this character. To achieve that, the student must use the sound and the direction of the movement. Drama has to be created by the performer because the notes do not have it.
Miriam Fried also comments that dynamics in Beethoven have an important structural function: the student can use them to accumulate tension. Besides, the professor highlights the importance of the harmonies those need to be reflected in the sound. This sound not always should be equal neither always pleasant.
About chords, Fried recommends the student not to play so loud the chords out of the pulse, and they work how to attack them. Fried also recommends playing them differently depending on harmonies. She also advises playing closer the bridge with a faster vibrato to get more brilliant chords.
Afterwards, Fried mentions that rhythm is more important and intense and therefore the accent must be played in proportion to that: this music is full of joy and not so serious. After some comments on articulation, she points out that it is necessary to enjoy with the form, like a game of arpeggios and scales, playing in rapport with the piano and with dynamical...
The professor explains the importance of the control of bow movements (bow-arm). He also talks about articulation, phrasing, arpeggios, dramatic character, tempo, harmony and harmonic color, and the relation between melody and piano accompaniment. The direction of the arm has to be as a pendulum, making half circles, taking advantage of the energy. The width of the chords' movement determines the sound. They also talk about musical expression and how to perform arpeggio chords.
This masterclass is focused on the development of the movement and on bowings, pulse, use of vibrato, and articulation. The professor advises the student to work on some of Sevcik's exercises to improve the shifting positions. The important thing is the position of the arm, as well as the distance from the bow and the speed.
Other important aspects are melody skips, harmony of the trills, volume of the sound, tension between intervals, and right arm position.
There are three main aspects in which Professor Fried wants to work on:
e. The clarity of the music in formal aspects. They talk about the development of the movement, where there are two important elements: the piano accompaniment of the left hand, in quarter-notes, that gives all the dramatism; the combination of two repeated elements to give more tension than the exposition.
f. Acoustics issues: the student tends to finishes each phrase withe an inaudible note. Playing piano does not mean not to hear the note.
g. Dialogue between the violin and the piano part. It is necessary to feel more communication, more conversation, and to know very well the role of every part.
All the corrections in phrasing, dynamics, character, fingerings, etc. tend to improve those three basic aspects. The music is a constant movement and the bow is the instrument we use to shape all these fluctuations.
Fried gives two interesting advises: the student should study from the general score to find all the interactions among the two instruments and should enjoy the details and the musical differences because in Brahms every detail is connected with the whole. Finally, Fried explains more aspects of the expression in this sonata and insists on the idea of developing the imagination creating a...
This piece requires different colors, so Professor Fried advises the student not to play with the same bow direction, distribution or speed. At the beginning, the sound should be low, and then it should gradually increase with vibrato. Regarding vibrato, it is recommended to place the flat finger on the string.
Finally, Miriam Fried gives an indication about character and tempo for the cadenza, and other aspects like glissandi and fingering according to the style of the period.
Professor Fried starts talking about the special aspects of this piece, the circumstances of its composition and the poem related to it. Within the musical aspects, it is important the wide range of emotions and colors. Thus, they will work throughout the class both: the emotions and colors and which tools are going to help her achieving that. Although they focus on the beginning of the piece, in general, the details have to be organised consciously in larger structures.
The vibrato gives a special color to the sound. The right hand is the responsible of the expression in the violin, but the left one gives the color, as well the pitch.
In a two-voice passage, the two melodies have to be heard because the audience has to distinguish the dialogue, so we have to give special attention to the different sound planes and intervals. Fried explains the importance of finding the sound and the bow speed which allow the music to sound easy and comfortable.
The pulse in three beats can be very different depending on the character of the piece: waltz, minuetto, sarabande. Finally, Fried talks about vibrato in relation to the sound. The bow has to change at the same time we change the vibrato. The goal is to reach a specific color, which is easier to find if we play with flexibility.
First, Professor Fried recommends the student to be always aware of the sound, its functions and development. She talks about vibrato in relation to the phrasing. Fried explains the limitations of the violin as an instrument, so it is advisable to move within these borders. She corrects some concrete aspects to the student: the arrival to the high pitch, the head position and the way to use the weight of the arm.
Fried explains issues related to counterpoint, accompaniment and relaxation. It is necessary to plan a passage in 'agitato' character, taking into account the moments in which we let go of the energy. They work on trills, character, accents, dynamics and expression. In passages where we give more and more bow, the music slows down so because the bow brakes because of the friction. It is a physical question. So, the more sound we want to get, the less bow we have to use.
Finally, Professor Fried talks about the interaction with the orchestra. The question is not to play loud, as it is not a musical concept, but to set up a conversation between both instruments (or between the orchestra when there is an orchestra instead of a piano). The character of the last passage should be played with more fantasy, listening and enjoying the harmony, and feeling the magic of the...
The professor advises the student to establish a quicker tempo from the beginning.
She insists on the importance of color changes: it is not just a question of dynamics; they are necessary both to point out the tonal modulations and for the phrasing when the violin has a long note and the piano has a change in harmony. The student has to plan this color changes to save enough bow and to put more interest in emphasizing the dissonances.
About the tempo, when the student is late during the movement, it is like a machine running out of fuel and it is not comfortable for the pianist.
About phrasing, it is very advisable not to play in such a horizontal way. The phrase has to get somewhere and it must have direction. Without that vertical point, this horizontal approach has no meaning. For example, in a specific phrase, the climax is on the high G, so the student has to think how to get there.
In this masterclass, Professor Fried asks what the movement is about and explains the use of the bow and its connection with the phrasing. Harmony is important in this work, as well as its colors and how to achieve them with the bow with vibrato. In some phrases, it is better to join notes in groups and to control de sound that rises and falls. It is very important to define the structure of the movement.
The professor advises the student to do the 'choreography' of the right arm without either bow or violin, just with the arm. The student has to think about what she wants to do with the sound and the differences and contrast between the parts, as well as to try out all the possibilities.
The indications about phrasing are to play in one line and to pay attention to the 4-bars phrase. It is necessary to connect all the notes of a group and to avoid losing them in a phrase. It is necessary to clarify the high point.
The tempo is not too slow. There are other comments about harmonic progressions, vibrato, bow speed, articulation, intervals, coda, and rhythm clarity - if needed.
About sound quality: the bow has to be more concentrated and to project and change the color in some passages. The imagination is very important to picture the musical idea and to be able to communicate it.
Professor Fried asks the student about the first movement. She explains all the important aspects related to the character in several passages; the harmony, bow speed, projection of the sound, vibrato -as an specific color, and the analysis of the score.
Repeating a motif four times has a reason, such as arriving with more determination to a point, thus increasing the drama. That is why the student has to identify the structure and decide how far she goes, how to prepare, which notes should be emphasized, and what is the harmonic sense of what is being played. It is not enough to play bar to bar. It is necessary to study the piece in detail. It is also interesting to project the sound to the audience to get their attention.
In this first part of the masterclass, Professor Miriam Fried works on some issues about rhythmical accuracy, pulse and tempo. Then she advises the student on phrasing and accents - not to think note by note, but in bigger groups. Finally, Miriam Fried explains some technical issues related to left hand fingers and pressure.
In general, this second part of the masterclass with Miriam Fried is focused on sound quality and how to improve it. In this sense, Professor Fried gives some advice about bow pressure, movement and distribution, elbow position, coordination, shifts, double cords, weight, and bow speed.
Miriam Fried works with the student some issues about tuning (the first finger is too high), the character of the movement, energy, phrasing, and fingerings. The pressure on the thumb should be released. The professor also focuses on the distribution, direction and quantity of the bow depending on the phrasing. The preparation of the sound is important, as well as the differentiation of the notes -whether they are active or passive- in a certain passage. If the student does not know how to explain what is going on in the music, he is not going to be able to do what he wants.
The professor also talks about harmonic, pressure, and articulation issues in certain musical phrases: scale 'in legato', attention to the harmonic progressions, contrasts, and others.
The student has delivered a good sound, but this movement is like the opera and it should be more declaimed, with a more operatic and exaggerated character. Professor Miriam Fried gives some instructions about articulation and phrasing, and she gives the student some advice on feeling the evolution of the form in the pulse and making contrasts and different colors. Then she focuses on bow positioning and postural corrections. It is necessary to be "connected" and to feel the legato in the fingers. Moreover, Fried highlights the importance of the proportion in the musical decisions (i.e. the vibrato should not be excessive), and she makes other considerations about harmony and resonance. To conclude, Miriam Fried insists on the way to play this Adagio - with generosity and theatricality.
This movement has a playful and cheerful character, which has to be expressed in the performance. Professor Miriam Fried also works on articulation, harmonic and ornamental elements, bow direction, movement of the arm, etc.
Finally, she highlights and lists the elements that produce and change the color of the sound. A performer should think and experiment with all these elements, to combine them in order to get the required sound changes.
After commenting something about Oistrakh's cadence, Professor Fried starts to work a very important aspect: the mood in music. She develops this point talking about Mozart's mood and its influences in his works, how the same spirits has to control both, the way we study or the way we perform the piece, the importance to clarify the emotions that the music causes in us and the need to not ever forget why we do music.
She follows the masterclass explaining Mozart's harmonic resources and how they set up the mood of the piece. Sometimes Fried mentions the operatic character of some passages and the need to balance with the orchestra.
We have to keep all the time our motivation while playing music. It is what makes different and special a performance. The key is not to chase the perfection because it is not what matters - she gives some examples of musicians searching more than a mechanical performance, such as the maestros Stern, Menuhin, Oistrakh, Milstein.
Other requirement to reach a deep knowledge is to integrate all the little units -rhythmical and melodic motifs - in larger structures, thinking in big dimensions. Finally, Fried recommends the student to pursue the proportion in all the aspects, such as gestures, dynamics, phrasing, articulation, because it is what...
The masterclass begins with an explanation about the convenience of playing the reprise, as the Minuet-Trio-Minuet in the classical period, so that the piece finishes in tonic.
The student focuses too much on the first note, neglecting the following ones. Afterward, Miriam Fried corrects some issues about vibrato, phrasing depending on harmony, bow pressure, sound, intervals, and performance attitude.
This is a very original piece in which different moods are changing all the time. The student should enjoy more the music, which does not imply more character, instead of rushing up. In the main theme, the cromatism F-F sharp is very important and the student should use every gesture to show the musical phrasing. If we take more time as necessary is to prepare the movement. All bow movements have to follow the outline of the phrase.
Professor Fried continues with some explanation about structure: it is very important the general shape of the piece - every passage has its function within the whole and should be related to the previous and posterior fragment. The work of a musician is to show what is happening in the music, so the contrast is very important to show this flow to the audience. So, the recommendation for this kind of works in which the dramatic events happen very quickly is to study every passage separately to reach the real character of everyone.
After that, they are played together to feel the connection. To sum up, the main difficulty in this piece is to link all those passages. They work on pizzicato and Fried insists on the importance to be worked as other technical problem. Professor Fried thinks the way we play should translate our emotions into...
At the beginning of this masterclass, Fried makes some general comments on variety and expressivity: the performance should not be so plain and smooth. They talk about the character of the piece and the type of feelings that this Melodie should express. The harmonies used by Prokofiev in this first piece indicate color and tension - relaxation. Prof. Fried advises the student to use the bow for building this form. She also highlights the starting chromatism and the importance of using the bow direction to get the required sound.
The performer has the role of communicating and telling something by playing, so he must project more to be listened properly. After a correction about the ending of a certain phrase, the professor points out the responsibility of any musician for having his own opinion on the way to play. In this manner, he will transmit the performance better.
Fried also emphasizes the importance of making the sound inflections as if the performer was speaking with words (using more accents and less speed in the relevant ones). Then Miriam Fried reviews some issues about vibrato, phrasing, or ending of the sound, among others. To conclude, they talk about the correct way to finish the sound regarding where is located -medium or final part- and about the type of...
After a brief general comment about expressivity, Miriam Fried sets out a question about the character for this second piece and she comments the importance of the piano accompaniment in its definition. She also mentions that, in general, there should be a sound for the accompaniment and another for a main idea with different characters.
Afterwards, they talk about the motion of the arm and bow to play pizzicato correctly. Fried also suggests playing with more different colors. This can be obtained with five elements related to the bow: speed, weight, contact point, air quantity and vibrato. Finally, the professor comments some phrasing issues and she recommends the student to play with more velocity changes on the bow in order to get more contrast and expressivity.
The explanation begins at the end of the piece and deals with sound, dynamics, and bow use. Professor Miriam Fried insists on this last issue and explains possible bow changes (in specific passages), the right arm movement -like a pendulum and freer- and bow speed. She talks about the position of the left hand in relation with the use of the vibrato.
The fingers are very important while playing because they convey musical information. The sound must be more concentrated, which means that the student must be more conscious of the contact point. It is important to be aware of the other instruments in the orchestra to have a correct balance. It is also interesting that the student makes a visual choreography of the performance and thinks more about the requirements of the piece.
This movement is inspired in the "pas de deux" (ballet), so it should have a less "angular" and more "rounded" articulation and a metric in two bars. The peculiar dotted rhythm of this piece establishes its character. In addition, the professor talks about legato issues, bow speed, weight and bow placing. To finish, Miriam Fried advices the student to pay attention to her own attitude and emotion so that she does not look so mechanical and she gets the required musical mood.
Fried explains that this work has two different parts - dance and virtuosity - and a dual purpose: for the virtuosity, the student has to adopt an attitude of impressing the audience, learning to communicate the message instead of showing the technical difficulties.
She also talks about bow and relaxation and how to connect a sound with the following. Fried says that the music is always in movement, we are telling a story, so we have to know how to do it. The professor talks about harmony, consonance and dissonance and the importance to take musical decisions following a planning. The most remarkable thing is the emotional vision of the work and how we transmit it to the audience.
In the virtuosic part, the student has to think in groups of notes, analysing the phrase in order to simplify it. The bow helps us to express the music. Fried explains the use of the bow in different moments of the piece and how to connect a sound with the following sound. To control the performance, it is necessary to know the piece very well, which avoids being scared. One useful advice might be not to forget the reason why we do music.
At the end of the class, Professor Fried explains the vibrato in relation with harmonics and the use of the right arm together with the bow, as well as the...
In this masterclass, there are technical corrections on bow technique and articulation and phrasing.
Regarding the bow technique, the bow has to move as if it was dancing and the student must play with more contact between fingers and bow. It is necessary to modify the quantity of bow depending on the different character of the passages.
As per the articulation and phrasing, the sensuality of this piece lies on the triplets, and the secret is to lengthen the second note of each triplet. The articulation must be clearer, thinking in consonants. In the phrasing, join the notes in groups. In case a finger is not being used, it should be off the string.
Corrections on glissando. There are also some comments about general issues, such as attitude and study methods: as musicians, we have the responsibility to correct what we do not like and does not make us happy, we have to experiment with all the possibilities. If something goes well during the study at home, we have to be able to repeat it in front of the audience; to that end, we must carry out a very reflective study, being aware of each movement.
Professor Fried works on the sound with the student and all her indications and corrections are focused on the tools to improve the quality of sound. Each string of the violin has its own character and sound, so we have to use the bow in different ways to show the special acoustic feature of every string.
The student has to think about the sound he wants every moment. He has to focus on the beginning and the further develop. All the sounds have their order and shape. A very useful advice is to think the sound in the same way as we talk ('speak the phrase'), so we adopt the same breathing and phrasing.
Fried also corrects the position of the bow and the movement of the arm while playing, as well as the trunk gestures to avoid losing the balance. She talks about triplets, shiftings, double stops, phrasing and bow, with the common idea of being completely aware of the feelings about what we play every moment. Fried gives some explanations in relation to the performer and the musical idea.
There are some initial general comments about this movement -it is a big line that grows up to the climax and then goes down, yet it does not have a clearly defined sonata form .
After that, Prof. Fried deals with issues such as phrasing, vibrato, dynamics, and articulations. She also makes a brief reflection about the writing by Shostakovich and other contemporary composers.
Professor Fried points out that bow speed and distribution are tools to express emotion. It is important to know the orchestral instruments that take part in certain passages because this has an effect on the required sound balance. She also suggests the student to consider that the musical character is provided by both the "discourse" speed and the agogics.
At the beginning of the masterclass, Miriam Fried focuses on vibrato explanations: speed, bow weight, intensity, connection between the notes.
The type of vibrato depends on what we want to express. Regarding the first movement of the violin concerto, Fried highlights the distant character of the start and other expressiveness issues. She also makes some corrections about dynamics, harmonic analysis, thematic contrast, sound quality and articulations, among others. To conclude, Professor Fried proposes a violin technique exercise to improve the bow technique and therefore the sound quality.
Miriam Fried talks about the virtuoso character of the coda. It is not necessary to phrase each note, the violin part has not thematic interest. However, the important thing is to give form and direction to the groups of notes without interfering with the orchestral theme, and to show contrast in the registers.
The Professor then works issues such as rhythmic precision, sound balance, clarity in the arpeggios, articulation and accents, fingering and shifts, quantity and weight of the bow, among others. Finally, Prof. Fried advises the student on tuning: in certain passages, the student plays higher than the piano because she presses too hard the fingers on the fingerboard.
Professor Fried comments the powerful performance of the student but the convenience of focusing on all the specific possibilities of the violin: color and expression. They analyze the beginning of the piece and how the sound has to respond to every dynamic and harmonic details because those first notes create the character. What it is very important is to create a personal image of the piece.
She also talks about bow speed, what conforms the flow in music, and the way to hold the violin. All the expressive aspects should be organic and proportional to the previous and posterior passages.
The solo part has to follow the orchestra to get the correct character. So it is very important to know and work on the general score.
Fried comments some aspects of Sibelius' life and compositional procedures. They work on vibrato, quick passages, pressure and weight, phrasing and expressivity. Finally, Fried insists on the idea of having a general vision of the work and the importance of developing the tools that will take us to reach our idea.
Professor Miriam Fried works on some issues about the sound and intensity. She also advises the student about the movement of his right arm, his vibrato (more sound is related to the bow, not to more vibrato), the quantity and flexibility of bow that he needs, articulation, tempo without changes, bow control, and other relevant subjects. It is important not to cut the melody and to take into account the character, dynamics and sound required in each moment.
Professor Fried remarks the theatrical character of the piece and compares it with Richard Strauss' Der Rosenkavalier . In this work, it is necessary to have a wider range of energies. In the reprises and the repetitions of the material, it is more interesting to play in a different way.
The student has to be aware of the harmonic changes, as projecting the music. Everything is connected. The phrasing is more open and the colours more exaggerated.
The professor gives advice on bow use, sound, character, chords and vibrato. She also gives some keys about the piece's signification, articulation and rhythm. It needs to be played with more unease.
Professor Fried asks the student about the inspiration of this movement. She makes corrections on phrasing, shifting positions, movements of the right arm, vibrato, and bow speed. It is necessary to make more color changes and to build the character - it should be calm, as if sleeping. The student has to take into account the direction of the phrase and the arrival point. The attack of each note should be made from the beginning of the sound.
At the beginning of the masterclass, Professor Fried talks about the general character of the piece and comments that the Nocturne is based on color. In the Tarantella , she remarks the importance of the accents to show the suitable character: powerful and Spanish (like 'zapateado').
It is advisable to pay attention to the composer's clues but the performer has to create the atmosphere, their task is to explain the meaning of the music, not only with the notes but also with the body language.
She explains the phrasing, the expressivity, bow speed, dynamics and so on, and makes a reflection about the purpose of every note: those whose function is decoration and others with more structural role. It is important to have in mind and to use all the musical aspects which conform the character of the music.
The student must communicate with all his body, including his face.
As the piece is a baroque sonata edited by Kreisler , the student has to decide how to perform the character and the baroque color, while maintaining Kreisler's elegance. It is a question of style and how to find the balance without ambiguity.
They make some comments about the most important aspects of the movement, melody - with correct articulation and rhythm, dynamics, vibrato (as singing, as a different color); phrasing - which should be as a text sentence: it needs breaks and different movements of breathing, appoggiatura; the connection of the notes, harmony, and the character of the movement (as a Sicilian dance).
The projection of the sound has to be similar to what singers do, but through the bow.
At the beginning of the lecture, Professor Fried gives general recommendations about the meaning of playing with someone else and about what it implies, in terms of gestures, communication and the rapport among parts. It is important, as musicians, to show the particular characteristic of each music (she makes a comparison between Tartini's Sonata and Tchaikovsky's Concerto ).
Regarding the harmonic aspects, each sound has to be adapted to the harmony and listened to in a more conscious way. Harmonic rhythm is also very important. In the cadenza (completely composed by Kreisler) the harmony in dominant-tonic has to be played with more sound. The professor explains some aspects of the trills: it is necessary to be in time before the trill's passage, so that they are not late. They must be played as if going up the steps.
There is a final recommendation about listening as much as possible, attending master classes with other teachers, and as much information as possible, in order to become an open-minded person.
This piece by Tchaikovsky should be performed with a dancing (vals) and funny (scherzo) character, but the student makes it rather heavy and serious. That is why Professor Miriam Fried focuses on a lighter and more beautiful performance by the student. Down-bow is vertical and the rubato should be flow freer. Besides, the professor makes some corrections about phrasing, harmonic structure and chords. It is important to know the harmony of the piano in order to make decisions and show different colors. As a conclusion, Miriam Fried explains that the way to create emotion is by changing the bow speed.
At the beginning, Miriam Fried congratulates de student for his performance and gives some ideas to think about them: Tchaikovsky is the composer of ballet and splendid melodies and the influence of the dance can be found in this concerto. All ballets are based on different steps and the contact with the floor. In this case, the student is stuck to the ground.
Other aspect is the tempo: it is decided in relation to the expression and character of the music. If we have a harmonic rhythm, we need more time to assimilate all the changes; on the contrary, more activity requires a quicker tempo. All the fluctuations if the tempo should be justified musically. In the main theme, afterwards the initial cadenza, we should be climbing steps and enjoying while climbing them.
Playing with the orchestra is also important: it is a big machine which requires to be heard. We have to study the moments in which we have more freedom, so the general score must be learnt.
Fried also talks about the relation between figuration and emotion and gives a wide explanation about the use of the bow, to be used in a more descriptive way. The process would be: decoding and understanding what the composer means, then making and building a personal idea and finally, choosing the tools which will help...
Professor Natalia Prishepenko remarks the importance of the piano part, which is necessary to be kept in mind. Although the musicians play by heart, it is important that they have the score with them to feel how 'chamber music' is "made" and to be aware of the other parts.
Some indications on the violin's particella and the general score.
The professor explains the weight that must be given to the first notes at the beginning and the right position in relation to the piano for chamber music performance. The student has to focus on phrasing, emphazising the drama, the bridge as the place to project the sound, and the bowings at the end of the movement.
After giving the students some general indications at the end of the performance, Natalia Prishepenko advises them on the maintenance of the intensity from the beginning: bowing and articulation must go with the character of this piece. Afterwards, she makes some comments about phrasing and articulation applied to specific passages.
Natalia Prishepenko makes some comments about the fourth movement of Schumann's Piano Trio No. 3, Op. 110 , such as the "leggiero" character of certain passages, the freedom in the violin and the rapport with the piano, the continuation of the crescendi until the end, and stronger sforzati.
Finally, she adds some general comments about the Viennese chamber music.
After giving the student some recommendations about bow changes, Professor Prishepenko works with her some issues, such as rest points in the piece, high notes in pianissimo, positive attitude and facial expression, suitable moments for making vibrato, and orchestral considerations. She also gives explanations on bow direction regarding the phrasing, tempo issues, different staccati in fast passages, and weight of the arm for double stops.
At the beginning of this masterclass, Nobuko Imai recommends the student knowing better the music and what is happening in every moment to get a more suitable performance for her. For example, dynamic should be more 'piano' regarding the orchestral accompaniment in a specific moment. Then the professor makes several comments about the composition, sketches, manuscripts and editions of this Viola Concerto . Imai plays the beginning of the piece and she points out the importance of the expressiveness.
Afterwards, Prof. Imai makes indications - among others - about phrasing and melodic direction, metrical rigor or freedom depending on the character and colors, type of sound (thicker and tenuto, like a trumpet in a certain point), rhythm and contrast in the climax.
On the next part, expressiveness is also important, and not to play too much slowly. It needs more flavour and an appropriate phrasing.
In general, she recommends the student being more active with the bow without losing quality of sound, and she proposes a better bow distribution to achieve this. It is also important that the student distinguishes what is (or not) the main melody in the piece.
As a conclusion she highlights the importance of knowing the whole structure of the piece: where the climax and relaxing...
Nobuko Imai starts her explanation by talking about the composer, Carl Stamitz , and the context of this work. She also comments that the student's viola is not a very loud instrument, so he will have to use more resources to compensate this lack of sound. Imai thinks that it would be good for him to play a bigger viola with a darker sound.
Focusing on the piece, the student must think the notes towards the low register, it is something like a "downbeat feeling". In the Classic style, the first beat of a bar is very important, so the student has to avoid any fear to play it with power. They work in detail on the articulation and the sound of the beginning. Professor Imai explains step by step the tension in the bow, the pressure on the strings and the speed to be applied every moment. She corrects the tuning and the contact point in double stops, so the student has to keep in mind how to sound. It is very important to show the new elements that appears in the music.
The Professor also talks about the character of this concerto and how to achieve it through a specific articulation. She explains that power in the bow is necessary, but we have to use just the required energy without losing control, without jumping. The recommendation in fast passages is not to emphasize...
Professor Pamela Frank asks the student to describe the idea of the piece and the intention of the composer. All the movement is filled with different expressions, which must be underlined. All of this has a strong connection with the melodic aspects and the length of the phrases. In relation to dynamics, all those expressions need more contrast. Professor Frank talks about the rapport with the piano (orchestra part) and insists on rhythm and resolutions (phrase ending).
They also works on bowings. It is necessary to 'sing' more with the bow and play with more passion, to rekindle the bow and even to exaggerate sometimes.
At the end of the movement, the character is 'morendo', so every aspect of the expression extinguish little by little, including the vibrato.
Professor Pamela Frank starts with a brief consideration about the risk of being too much influenced by the recordings, in the case of such well-known pieces as this one. She then compares the works by this composer with those by Mozart (Tchaikovsky's favourite composer). The structure is comprised of long movements and Professor Frank also talks about the orchestration in this composition.
Later on, they work on several issues, such as sound spaces, vibrato, agogics, harmony, phrasing, syncopation and rhythm, character, and rapport with the piano.
In this masterclass, Professor Meyer talks about different general aspects, such as tempo, dynamics, color and character. About the tempo, it is necessary to maintain the same pulse during the piece, and not to speed up in the cues. The rhythm is a progressive element in this work and it is always in close relation to the tempo.
Referring to the dynamics, Meyer corrects some 'crescendo' and 'diminuendo' in specific passages; he also thinks it is required more presence of the piano part. In relation to timbre or color, this piece needs a very special atmosphere. Finally, the character of the piece should be lighter, peaceful, sometimes energetic and going to the final with more 'accellerando'.
In this masterclass, more aspects on Debussy's clarinet part are worked in detail. They talk about different kinds of articulation: staccato, marcato, sostenuto and several variations of each attack.
Meyer works also on rhythmical accuracy: in relation to the pulse, a specific rhythm with the same 'impulse', the silence as a part of the internal rhythm and the trill as a rhythmical ornament. In relation to the general technique, they comment aspects such as sound projection and emission and the ways to open the sound. Finally, Professor Meyer explains the relation and the correct rapport with the orchestra.
Prof. Meyer begins his lecture explaining that he felt the performance has not been adequate regarding the date of the composition of the piece. All the musical aspects are correct, but he misses more expression, and tuning can be also improved.
Resuming the beginning of this first piece, Meyer indicates that the sound should be "fuller" and legato, singing like a tenor. The professor points out some tuning issues, among others such as phrasing, timbre and sound quality, or dynamics. Paul Meyer also recommends the student to feel more positive while he performs the piece.
About the sound, in professor's opinion it should be like coming from mountains, very even and more atmospheric. He also talks about interpretative styles which don't fit with his idea of high-quality sound. For the professor, it must not be so open, and he mentions and plays examples from other pieces with a similar sound. Besides, he advises the student to be more relaxed and focused on sound, without moving and doing anymore but at the same time controlling internally the air and breathing.
The student needs time to achieve all of that, but to begin with, he can practice the breathing trying not to take too much air brusquely and playing longer.
In this masterclass, Paul Meyer corrects the rhythm at the beginning of the piece. Then he corrects the tuning for a specific high note: he proposes another fingering and he suggests not to press so much and play more relaxed to improve this.
Meyer continues with other indications about the better quality and type of sound for this piece. Regarding the breathing, the professor comments that the student takes too much air and Meyer recommends him not to breath in certain moments. They work on this, and also on getting a more suitable sound and on a proper use of the air in the body.
In this masterclass Professor Frankl explains some general aspects of sound in relation to Beethoven: the importance of sound in this composer, even in dynamics marked as "piano". So it is very important to pay attention to the dynamic when it is written "cantabile" on the score. The professor finds also very useful to identify every sound with the color of each orchestral instrument. We have to be aware of the sound we want to achieve in every note and prepare it beforehand.
Professor Frankl also talks about the melody as a main parameter: melodic elements have to sing as an opera singer. In the phrasing, we must identify the most important pitch, the summit. The use of the pedal can help to get more intensity in a passage (more pedal=more intensity).
In relation to sforzati, it is necessary to measure the power and force of every sforzato and establish a hierarchy. The syncopations in left hand are very important because they dress up the melody.
In the development, the student has to know that this is the most difficult part because the material is fragmented and not organised in a line; there are two notes that remind the main theme. A different atmosphere is required here and the rhythm has to be more accurate.
Professor Frankl also talks about the use of pedal in...
Professor Frankl gives some explanations about dynamics, articulation, pedal and sound balance: it is very frequent in Beethoven music to have a piano subito after a crescendo. The sforzati marks should be more separated, the articulation could be played as a detache. Referring to pedal, it is more difficult to use in articulated passages, so the student must identify those fragments. The most important thing is to understand and clarify the element to be highlighted in every moment.
Professor Frankl comments the first movement of Beethoven's Piano Sonata in many musical aspects, such as dynamics, expression, phrasing or sound layers. In certain passage, it is necessary to reduce the intensity after the chord and then it is the moment to grow up, but not before. The left hand should avoid overlapping the right one. In general, phrasing is thought as a long line and not every two bars. Harmonically, all the changes must be prepared beforehand. About dynamics, the student has to control the progression of the crescendo in long passages (the crescendo grows up step by step). Professor Frankl also advises the student to pay more attention to rhythmical designs. In the Andante, the quite and calm character should be pointed out, but always in the right tempo, without ritardando. Finally, Frankl comments the correct tempo at the beginning of the development.
In this masterclass, Peter Frankl makes a point about sound quality (it should be more 'beethovenian'), phrasing, weight and attacks, dynamics, and metric issues, among others. Then he also talks about the melodic identification and the harmonic processes for this movement; as well as about the composing procedures by Beethoven. Afterwards, Professor Frankl gives some indications about expressiveness and he uses the Fugue (fourth movement) and Arioso (third movement) in order to explain the agogics and the freedom of tempo in this kind of harmonies.
Regarding the second movement of the Piano Sonata No. 31 , Professor Peter Frankl makes some corrections mainly about agogics, dynamics, accents and articulation; and he also works with the student on sforzati notes
Professor Peter Frankl advises the student to be less strict with the tempo and to wait a little more before the entrance of the Arioso theme. He then gives some indications about sound and legato while the student is playing the third movement of this Sonata.
In this masterclass, Professor Peter Frankl makes some corrections on tempo, agogics and metric issues. Afterwards, he talks with the student about the composer and the character of this movement. Peter Frankl also mentions the differences between the two fugues and two 'ariosos'. After some indications for the execution, they also work on dynamics and voice identification in certain passages.
Firstly, Prof. Frankl praises the student for her reading of the Piano Sonata . A musical aspect that she can improve is the climax in the middle section (too much hurried), and then the calm comes but not so soon. A certain passage with accents, the professor plays it differently and he uses another fingering to obtain more sound clarity. Forwards, the student should be more careful so that she doesn't reach the chords one beat late. Besides, Peter Frankl mentions some character changes and therefore the sound contrast which has to be conducted: the "Grandioso" must sound noble, and after that it should sound dramatic but not hysterical.
The professor insists on moments in which the student should play not so hurried or delayed, also taking into account the quality of the sound, phrasing and clarity of the execution. Regarding the part with octaves, they work on it by correcting their duration and the sound in the "fff" ones (it should be barnstorming).
Reaching the end, the professor highlights the performance of the syncopations by the student, and he points out that the crescendo should be played without accent. Finally, Frankl corrects the rhythm in the theme.
Prof. Frankl likes the general reading of the composition by the pianist very much. Although the student has not played the posthumous studies to keep the unity of the work, he has lost a little this unity sense for stopping too much between variations and playing too much ritenuti. Then, Peter Frankl makes comments and instructions about each specific study:
Thema: Andante and Etude 1 - Variation 1 : the professor talks about the tempo for the theme and the first variation. The theme ends like a question, and the answer is in the first variation. The end of the theme has a fermata, but also attacca to the Variation 1.
Etude 2 - Variation 2 : Frankl doesn't agree with the character that the student has performed here. It must be more "Florestan", more passionate. They also talk about the use of the thumbs in this part, which is very suitable in the professor's opinion.
Etude 3 : for this study, Frankl recommends top lay lighter, use a different fingering, and not stop too much in the double bar.
Etude 4 - Variation 3 and Etude 5 - Variation 4 : the professor indicates a mistake in the reading of the score for Variation 3 and he makes comments on chords and dynamics. The sforzato must continue until the first note of the Variation 4, and at the end of this...
In this masterclass they mainly work on phrasing and metrics. For the professor is important that the quartet knows the harmony of the piece in every moment to perform this phrasing and metrics (polimetrics, in professor's opinion) according to that.
They also work on other musical issues related to dynamics, bowings and bow direction, or accents and always regarding the rapport and organization between the members of the quartet. In a certain moment, the character should not be so heavy, and Schmidt makes also comments on color regarding the required type of sound.
They go on working the metrics, articulation and notes duration by the different instruments separately. Finally, they think about the more suitable tempo for the end.
The first suggestion by Prof. Schmidt is that the students should play a specific part (6 measures before Piu vivace) in one bow, without breaking. Then Schimdt comments that he found the tempo, in general, too slow. They focus on 10 measures before the end, where the professor indicates them the importance of taking into account the moments when there is harmonic tension and when that tension is released and how to translate it into the performance. Schmidt asks them to play these passages slowly and thinking about the more suitable articulations, dynamics and bows so that the produced sound become the best for each moment according to the harmony and character.
They work each passage by instruments, practicing the mixture between the different voices and the sound balance. The members of the quartet must always listen mutually and have a wide vision of the score to notice where the voices move in each time. Besides, Rainer Schmidt considers that sometimes play "beautifully" does not work.
In this second part of the masterclass, they carry on with the work on the fourth movement of the String Quartet, Op. 51, No. 2 by Brahms . It must sound noble. They practice some passages playing by voices ?EUR" especially those with harmonic changes - to improve mainly musical aspects related to metrics, rhythm and phrasing. Afterwards Schmidt makes some indications on bow issues: bow direction, bowings, tension to get the appropriate musical accents.
Moreover, they practice the "Poco tranquillo" part by voices (violin II and viola, etc.). As the professor pointed out at the beginning of this masterclass, it is polymetric and the students must practice it by themselves in detail to get the right rhythm.
In this second part of the masterclass, the quartet carry on working the different passages by voices under Schmidt's guidelines. The professor gives indications about the tempo and rhythm, articulation and upbeats, etc. Besides, Schmidt highlights the importance to analyze and feel the harmonies to get the sound and character most suitable for them.
Rainer Schmidt makes more comments about this work, always considering how to reflect the composer's intentions in the performance. They think about the phrasing and bowing for a certain passage, and the professor corrects the rhythm in a specific moment to improve the metrical precision of the "tranquillo" part before the end.
Professor Rainer Schmidt insists on the phrasing, vibrato and dynamics of the second part of the Minuetto. Moreover, the sound has to be more focused and more concentrated, and to create more tension in some moments. Regarding the tempo, it should not be so fast, and he compares it with Corelli's concerto concerto.
Professor Schmidt also explains the transition from the first movement to the second and works on colour changes and different possibilities.
Other comments about legato and articulation, tuning, tempo in some passages and violin fingering. The group has to breathe together and look for character contrasts to move away the monotony.
Professor Rainer Schmidt gives some indications to the first violin. Later on, he makes corrections on tempo, articulation and contrast between passages. He also focuses on a fragment with two violins and works it separated from the rest of the quartet.
Regarding the bow, the masterclass deals with different strokes, quantity and relaxation of the bow, pressure and weight, and attacks of the first note within a phrase. The Professor also explains the concept of spiccato.
Referring to melodic and expressive issues, the cantabile has to be worked in mezzopiano and the dynamics are more varied in general. The students have to pay attention to the articulation, tuning and sound quality.
Professor Rainer Schmidt ponders on the tempo of this movement: maybe it is so fast because Mendelssohn was looking for a powerful and brilliant character, with large quantities of sound. Regarding the beginning, Schmidt highlights a change of articulation and he asks the students for playing with different vibrato quantity and speed to achieve the best effect.
Rainer Schmidt also talks about the type of articulation and phrasing, the tempo and the dynamics. Then, they focus on the sforzati in a certain passage and they work on it with detail.
After training in order to improve the rapport and bow issues, Professor Schmidt comments the difficulty of Mendelssohn's string quartets and he encourages the students to think about the way of achieving a better performance.
Professor Schmidt advises the students on metrics in order to get a more appropriate character. Then he considers, together with the quartet members, the different accents, entrances, dynamics; the finger position to obtain a better control on the bow pressure, sound balance and color, harmony, and articulations, among other issues.
Additionally, Rainer Schmidt proposes them to find the relationship between the time and the sound, as well as other suggestions related to the bow technique.
The masterclass by Friedrich starts with a brief correction regarding the attacks, sometimes they are too sharp and also it is necessary giving more importance to the singing. Afterwards, the professor comments the necessary balance between the two soloist instruments, and he makes some corrections to the pianist. Many times, Hindemith writes different rhythms and beats for each instrument. Besides, trumpet can play little steps in relation to the phrasing and dynamics.
Moreover, there are some indications regarding the sound quality, tuning and cues. The student asks for the appropriate type of sound in a certain solo part, and then the explanation leads to some comments on Bruckner's 5th Symphony , Andris Nelsons and the last concert conducted by Claudio Abbado.
For this movement, Reinhold Friedrich suggests the student how to set his sheet music in a more suitable way. They speak about the required dynamics to play in line with the piano and the professor also comments the great importance of feeling always excited with the music, like a child who makes everything with a strong emotion or like Claudio Abbado who is always searching the small details which makes everything special.
For the initial cue, it is necessary to blow quickly without thinking on the high note because the required attack is very fast. The professor mentions how the performer must help herself by using the lips to reach the high tessitura.
French tradition usually imposes to play fast passages alternated with slower ones, but in this case the air is always "vif". Then they work on dynamics, metrical freedom, vibrato or phrasing for the fast descending passages, among other musical issues.
Prof. Friedrich also recommends not doing very big diminuendi in order to avoid losing the sound in the concert hall. Scherzando must not be exaggerated but progressing little by little. Besides, they speak about the sound ending, fermata and notes duration to get more expressivity and energy control. Finally, the professor explains how to perform the cadence. As per the performance, the professor congratulates the student.
Referring to the aria Ah! Per sempre io ti perdei from I Puritani , Reri Grist recommends the student to repeat a phrase and she insists that the student should use more the body support by opening the lower part of the abdomen. Besides, she asks the student for singing by keeping his hands back so that he is able to realize that the strength and the support for the voice are in the frontal part of the body not in the hands.
Afterwards, Grist insists that the student should imitate certain body and mouth gestures so that he can improve the way to sing this aria. She corrects also some subjects related to pronunciation for getting a higher sound quality. Other suggestion by Prof. Grist is that the student should put his back completely supported on the wall while breathing trying to open and support himself as much as possible and feeling his body front part. He must take his time and practice this at home.
Once they restart the aria, Grist recommends him to rest between phrases by breathing with calm and by relaxing the whole body to start again. She also insists that the student should not move so much his hands because it doesn't help. Finally, the student must keep the last note by projecting the sound as far as possible and the professor gives him a last...
At the beginning of the Recitative Or dove fuggo io mai? , Prof. asks the student for getting more into the role of Riccardo. Then, she corrects the tuning and duration for a low note at the beginning: the student should amuse himself more by singing that note.
For the next phrase, the professor suggests emphasizing more the contrast by using other color. Several times during the lecture, Grist stresses that the student must sing by showing more his voice. Afterwards, she gives him an advice about maintaining firm his body (with the feet stuck to the ground), opening and using more the chest.
Regarding the Andante affettuoso, Grist makes indications about some vowels pronunciation and she encourages him to repeat it several times so that he can perform this part with a suitable voice and a good sound support.
At the beginning of the masterclass, Professor Grist asks the student about the context in which Lakme is singing this aria, and she tells a personal story. They then talk about the character of this piece and they work on the beginning, just considering the resonance from the piano. Repetitions must be like an echo, so they must sound more piano but without cutting this sound. Besides, Reri Grist gives some indications about phrasing, performance, tuning, voice projection, trills among others. Finally, she points out that certain passage should be sung like small bells.
In this masterclass, Prof. Reri Grist works mainly on the student's articulation for the vowels. To improve this, Professor Grist recommends searching for a better voice colocation and the use of the facial resonators. In this sense, Reri Grist indicates the student to open her voice upper but at the same time maintaining the jaw more relaxed.
As a conclusion, Prof. Grist highlights the importance of using the head resonance to project the voice properly, and the appropriate articulation for vowels and consonants.
Professor Reri Grist explains the fundamentals of breathing and support of the voice to the student. They work together on phrasing in Mascagni's opera, as well as on the articulation and vocal space in vowels and consonants. The teacher explains the sound production in high register (head register).
Firstly, Prof. Grist corrects some notes duration and then she advises the student to listen carefully all the notes. About a specific high note, the student should be more connected with the tone. Mainly, the work on the voice colocation for the higher notes to get a suitable sound. Besides, the professor proposes the student to repeat the aria thinking how all her body (including her back muscles) should work on obtaining more voice.
Moreover, Reri Grist makes indications about pronunciation and phrasing, and she highlights the relevance of getting the tempo maintenance in a certain moment of the aria. After that, they revise again the Italian pronunciation and phrasing following the text because it is very important for the professor to say properly all the words with their required duration.
Finally, Professor Grist proposes some vocalisation exercises to the student: singing staccato, opening the jaw, pushing the sound up to the head and using also the diaphragm in order to reach the higher notes with a good quality for the voice.
In this masterclass, the student practices the way to learn this Constanza's aria (the student had not prepared it and she does not know it well). The professor is who suggests her to sing it because in her opinion, this aria is made for the student. They work the starting phrases: firstly, the melody without lyrics and then incorporating the text.
After that, the student practices it with the score and then without it, phrase by phrase. Reri Grist encourages her again to learn this aria because she thinks it matches with the student very well. The professor advises her to learn it like that, without seeing the notes but just repeating the melody by imitation to internalize the music without thinking about the high notes. In other way, psychologically she could shrink the throat.
Concerning the recitative, Prof. Grist makes mainly indications on agogics and metrical rigor or freedom. Referring to the aria, the professor recommends not pushing a certain note, but letting it just go. On several occasions, she corrects the phrasing regarding the lyrics. She suggests also making almost a sforzando in a certain note.
Afterwards, they work on pronunciation issues and how to place the voice with the vowels to get a good result for the higher notes. Reri Grist highlights again the importance of not pushing. Besides, she makes indications on breathing, notes duration, dynamics, tuning, tempo and trill execution.
Finally, she gives the student some general advices on his attitude to sing and what he should be worried about or not. She also recommends him listening recordings by Fritz Wunderlich (not to imitate him, just to notice his style) and including in his repertoire some Mozart's concert arias.
Reri Grist locates the aria in the whole opera and talks about the correct tempo. The Professor also gives some recommendations to the student: she has not to press the throat in high pitches and to keep always the phrasing shape as a curve, round as an arch. Moreover, Grist explains the correct way to place low pitches.
Finally, Grist advises the student to have a class with Teresa Berganza and learn the text properly. It is very important that the student knows exactly what she wants to do in every moment.
In this masterclass, which starts with the Recitative: Giunse alfin il momento , Professor Reri Grist corrects the student about the emission and the accuracy of the score in this Mozart's recitative. The student should control the breathing and take more time in the syllables that have more importance in the text. She has to "talk" the text.
In the aria, Reri Grist insists on the correct pronunciation of the text and on the student's breathing, which sometimes blocks her and prevents her to sing properly. The student should pay attention to the phrasing, the accurate duration of the notes and the tongue position to pronounce certain notes.
They work on vocal placement and throat opening and, again, the pronunciation has to be corrected in several passages. Reri Grist tells the student not to breath inside a phrasing, she must concentrate and keep the pitch.
In some high pitches, Professor's recommendation is not to push them because they sound very unnatural. Everything comes easier if she does not close the throat, therefore the voice is projected easily.
Prof. Grist likes the student's voice a lot, but she has the tendency to pull back all the time and it is not correct. Grist also corrects her the pronunciation and mouth colocation for certain vowels and she proposes the student some vocalizations to improve it. Resuming the aria, Reri Grist makes again corrections on voice colocation related to certain vowels and after that, she makes some comments on phrasing and tuning, tempo and agogics issues. For the last phrase, Grist suggests the student to be more energetic in the word "amar" and then leaving it like flowing in the air. The word "felicita" is also more allargando, as if she were describing this word by singing.
Reri Grist begins the masterclass congratulating the student about his voice, but she recommends him improving his posture and she mentions that the student has confused some words from the lyrics. Referring to this song, Grist makes suggestions mainly to get a more suitable phrasing. She corrects also aspects related to the voice placing in some specific moments.
About dynamics, it is important to make the small crescendo to obtain more variety. Moreover, he must avoid making excessive noises: there is no need to do so, and, besides, aesthetically, it doesn't turn out right. The performance is better when the singer is transmitting a message because it becomes more convincing.
About the performance of the recitative Surta e la notte , Grist firstly comments that the student has been sloppy with the rhythms. Moreover, the first syllable belongs to a specific word, so she must not sing it loud just like something independent. She also asks her for concentrating the sound and the meaning of the words.
Afterwards, the professor corrects the tuning in a certain phrase, as well as the duration and pronunciation to obtain the required sound for each word. The student must not lose the focus in order to avoid losing the sound.
Regarding the aria Ernani! Ernani, Involami , Reri Grist mentions to the student that they are not going to work it deeply but in general she needs to sing it with much more line and much more focus.
This masterclass lies in a quick review of this Valentine's aria.
Krause makes some corrections on pronunciation while the student is singing. Besides, the professor gives more instructions to get the highest final note properly. Then, there are more comments on French pronunciation for specific words, specially in the vowels. To conclude, they make a brief final comment about the Valentine's role.
In order to singing this aria properly, the first thing to be taken into account is that the air emission has to be completely free. It is necessary to breath and take the vowel without trying to form it, without thinking about it.
Afterwards, they focus on French pronunciation, specially the French "e" vowel. It is important to place the vowels up and to sing very legato.
In a certain moment, Krause indicates the student not to prolong so much a note, and not to sing so slowly because the right tempo is faster.
Professor Tom Krause talks about Moniusz' opera The Haunted Manor : the plot is about a migrant Polish family in the American Midwest. Regarding the student's attitude, Krause comments that she should release all tension. They work on several aspects of vocal technique: the pronunciation of the vowels "o" and "u", the voice support - which must be higher, and the way to pronounce the "t", thinking in an "h" before. The student has to be aware of the tempo, which is 'piu mosso'.
Professor Krause always insists on the idea that imagination and pictures created in their minds can help to focus a character. In this case, the student can imagine she is a large person, with a big head and an enormous body. He also comments that Polish is a very interesting language from a musical point of view.
As an introduction, Professor Tom Krause explains how the vocal chords work. The student has a cold, so in this case it is more convenient not to sing in a very technical way, but rather to sing as speaking and smiling.
Throughout this aria from Purcell's Oedipus , they work on phonetic issues, vocalic and English pronunciation. For the high notes, it is recommended "using" the whole body.
Afterwards, Professor Krause makes some suggestions about how to sing in a better way the piano notes: she should not narrow the throat in the attack on these notes and support them more.
To finish, the professor also makes some indications about breathing, support and body connection.
Besides the revision of the German pronunciation for some words of the lyrics, Prof. Krause focuses his comments on issues related to the voice colocation. Tom Krause suggests the student to sing as she was giving a hint of a smile, and he indicates with his hand where the resonances are located.
About the dramatization, the professor proposes her to sing as if her husband was there, with a deep feeling of love, pity and gratitude.
Moreover, Krause makes some short clarifications about breathing, phrasing and dynamics. He suggests the student to sing a certain passage with abandonment, but also as clear as possible. Finally, the professor comments that high notes should be plenty of resonance.
In this masterclass the student sings an unknown song to the professor and accompanying pianist, and so they make a revision very general and fast of this piece. The student indicates the tempo of the song, and after her performance, she explains the synopsis of the poem briefly: it is an existential matter in form of metaphor, now there is Autumn but Spring will come. Prof. Krause congratulates the student because she sings it with a lot of power and she reaches the high notes very well.
In this masterclass, they talk about the plot of this opera briefly. Regarding the student's performance, Prof. Krause points out that it is not convenient to form the "a" inside and he asks her for a deep breathing, singing free and easy, without tension in her face.
The professor also suggests her to place the voice up, and the vowel must be free. After that, there is a part more personal and intimate which has to be sung in piano.
About the high note, the professor gives some recommendations on how to prepare it better. They review together the pronunciation of several consonants and vowels in the text, particularly the "l". The voice needs to come from above, without pushing it down or touching the throat. To the correct pronunciation of the Russian "l", it is necessary a very loose and lazy tongue. Finally, Krause encourages the student with a comment about her improvement in the concentration of the sound and the power of her voice.
At the beginning of this aria, the student must not perform it so much emotional. The professor corrects him the pronunciation of some vowels, specially "o" and "a", which needs to be more open. To achieve this, Krause gives him some indications related to the voice placing and the sound support. This support must be firm and maintained for the whole phrase while the student sings legatissimo and without losing the focus.
Afterwards, Krause corrects the duration for a specific note and the point where it is suitable to breath for a certain phrase.
Prof. Krause insists on the importance of keeping all the time a good support so that the sound quality of the emitted notes is appropriate. Finally, the professor advises the student to maintain the forte until the end.
At the beginning of the class, Professor Thedeen asks the student about his impression of his performance and the way it would sound from the audience. The teacher comments that it is more important to think about the things we did correctly than the mistakes. As performers, it is very important to show some special moments in each performance, although it is a very difficult thing. Sometimes simplicity works better than other formulas.
Professor Thedeen gives some guidelines to the student for expressing the beginning of the piece and they comment how to do the arrival to the climax in the repeated note 'E'. When the piano takes the main theme, the cello could play a more interesting accompaniment, making a different kind of rhythm.
Fingerings should not disturb the rhythmical notation, it should be played in an easier way. The eighth-notes have to 'speak' more. The student should not forget giving more space to the most important notes of the phrasing. Professor Thedeen also comments that the 'B' note on 'E' string is one of the most difficult notes that a cellist could play. In some moments, it is required more understanding with the piano part. Finally, the Professor explains how to ration the dynamics in certain intense passages.
In general, the Professor Torleif Thedeen comments the importance of the piano part in this sonata and the need to join with it. For example, in the transition to the recapitulation, the cello should imitate the piano, especially in the upbeats. All the dynamics in both parts have to sound at the same time.
In 'piano' dynamics, the dark passages in low register should be clearer. Before the main cue of the theme, the most important note is the previous one, which creates the magic and the expectation. Professor Thedeen insists on the idea of creating the sound we hear internally and to play organically to clarify the structure.
When we play soft bowings, the left hand should not be pale or weak, but expressive, so we have to find the independence of both hands in relation to the expression.
In phrasing, it is better to wait until the most suitable moment to liberate the sound, not to anticipate. We must find the most appropriate phrasing in every moment, so the bowings help to find the phrase shape. They work on the conclusive section and different possibilities of expression and phrasing. Every moment we have to be aware of how the music has been built and which elements make it up. This way we can follow all the movements of the phrase.
Professor Thedeen comments the passion and the energy of the student's performance but, at the same time, the need to find a mood that remains for long time, to avoid mood changes. He also recommends the student to play every note with intention, but distinguishing which sounds are more intense than others, finding a balance within the phrase.
Professor Thedeen mentions other aspects of the piece, such us the rhythmical beginning, the tension of the bow (but not on the body), the connection between notes, the 'flautato' effect (played not 'sul tasto'), the clarity in every moment, the upbeats (more impressive), the bow changes adapted to the character.
The student needs to experience other forms of expression to reorganize her head. In many quiet passages, she should show this serenity. In conclusion, the student has to channel her energy to the sound and the musical structure.
Professor Thedeen congratulates the student for his performance and his sound quality. The student has to visualise the beginning, the main cue, before starting. When we have identical phrases, they should not be repeated in the same way, by the contrary, it is very desirable to create a long period of phrasing.
Thedeen talks about vibrato: different fragments may require different types of vibrato and not always the same. About tempo, it is possible to stretch just a little in some moment, although we keep a solid and steady pulse. We should show that something is coming, creating an expectation. The melancholic character loses somehow the essence if it becomes too slow because it is not an excessively dense and deep material, so it is necessary to have more the sensation of flow and always think about long lines of phrasing. When shifting, it is required enough time to do the vibrato.
They talk about fingerings and the most suitable finger in each moment, more when choosing between 2nd and 3rd one. Thedeen emphasizes the importance of the legato in several phrasings, even it is possible to do a little and quick glissando - it does not sound. More, the synchronization with the bow is crucial to get a good legato. The character changes should stand out with the help of...
Regarding the beginning of the piece, Thedeen suggests the student to avoid putting the best of him from the beginning as the climax is about to arrive. Moreover, it is interesting to feel in advance what it is going to come. He also recommends having the finger more active to control better the bow.
Prof. Thedeen also talks about how to calibrate dynamics and to go on phrasing after the thematical development. It is possible to maintain long sounds with vibrato.
He comments also that when we have to move the left hand to jump to another note, it is necessary to make sure that the contact point is near the bridge. Besides, the repeated notes should be played with more variety using the bow. The professor also suggests not to do a glissado so exaggerated. Finally, he comments that a passage can be rhythmical without giving up the expression.
At the beginning, Professor Thedeen talks about the podium when playing with the piano, it is not the best way to communicate because the instruments are in different levels. Specially in this piece, they have to feel together, piano and cello.
During the whole class, Thedeen talks about dynamics, the contact point, the concentration on the sound quality and the projection through free movements, etc. all this to achieve an expressive result.
Dynamics at the beginning are 'piano espressivo', so we should translate this indication in a musical thing, looking for the brightness of the sound -the use of the bow has to go in this direction. He explains the character of the main cue and the phrasing, sometimes between singing and talking. When the tension is coming, we have to feel it and to anticipate this climax. Finally, he comments that some changes of character should be more unexpected and gives the recommendation of using the glissando with vibrato to get a huge sound.
At the beginning, Thedeen congratulates the student for her performance. He advises her to play as natural as possible, keeping the expression but without forcing a muscle. Sometimes the impulses break the music breathing, so it is necessary to control it. Professor Thedeen also comments aspects about the articulation of specific notes in the phrase.
This is a music plenty of balance, that is what she should look for in every note, as well as the sound quality. Although the general musical idea is well set up, it is advisable to take care of every detail.
Thedeen talks about the upbeat of the Variation I and the technical passages and explains the way to improve them. He remarks the connection between notes within the phrasing and the relaxation as a very important aspect of sound production: it is compatible with the expression.
At the beginning of the lecture, Professor Thedeen talks about the tempo of the last variation. He recommends not to play 'all tasto' because with the orchestra the sound will not be clear.
In Variation IV , Thedeen corrects some aspects, such as phrasing, rhythm and scales. The student should be careful when the music goes from quick passages to cantabile notes because these pitches are affected by the speed of the previous passage. So, it is convenient to sing the notes specially.
Professor Thedeen also corrects the articulation and the dynamics of the trills and comments that it is important to have a very good contact point to explote the sound possibilities of the cello. Breathing is crucial in dramatic passages. He explains how to play the 'spiccato' and talks about fingerings and chords -each one has a different resonance depending on the vibration of each string. Finally, Thedeen explains that the us of 'portamento' is possible in some expressive passages.
First, Professor Tsuyoshi Tsutsumi explains where the work was composed, so that the student knows the composition context and can reproduce this freedom, relaxation, and natural character. Afterwards, they work on dynamics, phrasing, pulse, tempo and other musical issues for this Cello Sonata.
Tsuyoshi Tsutsumi also advises the student to play the chromatic passages with more expressiveness and enjoyment.
In this masterclass, they first work on the pizzicato at the beginning in order to improve the sound, and then Professor Tsuyoshi Tsutsumi makes some corrections on issues such as the left hand, expressiveness, phrasing, rapport with the piano, legato aspects, and vibrato.
Professor Tsuyoshi Tsutsumi comments the tempo of the work after the student's performance. Tsutsumi advices him not to waste the energy of the bow hand beforehand. The intention of the sound has to be shown at the right moment.
The student can sing the smaller notes and do it more fluent, enjoying it while playing.
The professor proposes some bowing changes, e. g., in the Polonesa theme, the second time it appears, the bowings have to be separated because it is a persistent music. They work on shifting the harmonics to get a more reliable position.
All the changes have to be anticipated with enough time. This way, the musical discourse is a continuous process.
Finally, fingerings, bow pressure, quality of sound in chords when the whole bow is working and the need to listen to himself are also aspects commented by Professor Tsutsumi during the class.
In this masterclass the conductor Vladimir Ashkenazy rehearses the third movement of Mahler's Titan, it is one of the last rehearsals before the concert. The corrections and indications revolves around general aspects such as tempo, dynamics, expression and listening/understanding among the different sections. It is also important for the orchestral musicians to pay attention to the conductor's gestures and facial expressions.
During the first part of the video the orchestra plays a movement of the piece until Ashkenazy stops to give for making some corrections about tempo, dynamics, rhythm and character.
Ashkenazy insists on the tempo and its relation to the character of the movement, that which is a march. The performance in general must be more active, however, but an energic character does not mean to lose the control or even to rush the tempo. He also corrects some passages of the trumpet parts.
The professor starts the explanation at the end of the movement: when the player is at the climax, it is advisable to imagine a soprano singing (Maria Callas). The professor gives indications on trill fingerings, the dramatic meaning of a repetition - and the need to highlight - and the way to play the spiccato, like jumping.
After those corrections, they work on the movement from the beginning: bowings with a prouder character, articulation to clarify all the notes - involving a change of character, and more attention to the harmonic changes, the bowings and the way to get more drama.
This is a romantic movement and the performance is 'too correct', the sound has to be more relaxed and natural in some points. The bow has to push more out of the string and relax more at the end of the bowing.
They talk about how to perform the beginning of the movement and they work on the speed and clarity of the string changes and on the contrast within a sequence.
Wies de Bouve gives an explanation about shifting and suggests keeping the contact point in a slow and expressive passage. It is necessary more bow in the arpeggios and vibrato to distinguish some notes and give more character. The slurs are organized in 4 and sometimes the piano imitates the double bass line (e.g. in the trill).
The student has to show the classical elegance contained in Hindemith's music. When finishing a phrase, we have to coddle it until the end.
The professor mentions the recordings of Koussevitzky playing his own works and he specifically recommends the students to listen to the recording of this Double bass Concerto .
He also gives some indications about character, vibrato, harmony accuracy, and the character of syncopations as if he was describing the sunrise - with a lot of intensity and keeping the tension.
In addition, the professor explains while he is playing how to get a better sound in a certain passage with chromaticism. In the passage alla breve, the student has to think in 2, not in 4 parts, find a different colour - an easier and more relaxing sound - and pay attention to the anacrusis. The professor also advises the student not to look at the fingers to find the position on the string, as he does not need it. He proposes some fingerings, articulations, bow strokes and directions.
The professor mentions some aspects related to phrasing, dynamics, articulation in legato, etc.
Bow changes should be prepared before in a relaxed way and without strong breathing stops to avoid sound interruptions. The character has to be appassionato and, in a certain passage, it is advisable the use of a different string to get better sound. He also makes some comments about fingerings, tuning and bow direction, distribution, speed, and quantity.
Finally, the professor works on shifts in detail, giving some advices and indications for a better practice.
At the beginning of the masterclass, the professor gives general indications about dynamics and colour of the harmonics in a specific passage close to the end of the piece. There is also a brief introduction about the work and the circumstances of its composition - it was commissioned for the film Dr. Zhivago. The professor describes the atmosphere and the character of the scene: first mysterious, then the light comes little by little, and finally it turns painful.
About sound balance, the soloist has to be heard in the moments in which the orchestra plays louder. In a certain passage, it is advisable not to play it as a scale exercise, but more appassionato and with more vibrato (the professor plays the passage to show the student how to do it). The professor also gives some additional comments and corrections about pizzicato, phrasing, harmonics changes and articulation.
The general idea after the student's performance is to play more fluent - the flow always goes ahead- and the professor advises him to always follow the original manuscript. The professor gives indications about phrasing and articulation, about string crossing and shifting, and corrects the bow inclination - with a more circular movement of the arm.
Other corrections are dynamics, pitch duration, character, agogics, ornamentation, contact point with the string, and softer pizziccati - round position of the fingers. Moreover, the professor proposes the student to work on the bass register and points out the harmony that contributes to create a character of 'dramatic surprise' in a certain passage.
The masterclass turns around articulation, phrasing, vibrato, and character.
The professor talks about the relevance of the articulation in the Classical period. It is very advisable to study the manuscript to pay attention to the articulation slurs.
The character of the beginning is prouder and it should be answering the orchestral introduction. The eighth notes in the repeated passages are shorter -it is necessary to change the articulation.
In a specific sequence, it is usual to play Forte-Piano and then go back to Forte.
The professor advises the student not to forget to enjoy the music -in the cases where it is possible to take more time in the phrasing-, and to pay attention to the orchestral base and the tension it creates, at the same time that to the tension of the dissonances.
The masterclass is focused on the quality of sound and the professor insists on the suitability to look up the manuscript and see the annotations on octaves in a certain passage, among others. There are a lot of corrections on the score referred to different articulations - Wies de Bouve compares a passage with another similar by Dittersdorff , use of original bowing, melodic leaps and expressivity.
The resonance of the strings and the chords is essential in this music, and the key to achieve this resonance is to create a "resounding" character. The professor makes a comparison between how a violinist plays and how the character is in certain moments. He also works on the movements and bow speed as well as the contact point in concrete passages.
The student should take care of the tuning for the first note so that it doesn't go flat. Then, Bennett comments that the difficulty of playing this passage is maintaining the sound until the end of the phrase by using a correct breathing. Other difficulty added to the previous one consists on playing forte at the beginning and getting the suitable sound balance with the orchestra - about this, while joking, he gives an advice by his professor Geoffrey Gilbert.
William Bennett stresses that the student must look for a well-tuned phrasing with a good quality of sound. Afterwards, the professor makes other indications on articulation, phrasing, alternative fingerings to get a better tuning, pulse or accents, among others. At the end of the masterclass, he comments also a brief anecdote about Jean Pierre Rampal referred to a certain part of this orchestral excerpt.
Prof. Bennett starts the masterclass with tempo indications at the beginning of the movement. Basically, the fast rhythms at the first part and the rapport with the piano are the issues that need more hard work due to their difficulty. Besides, William Bennett corrects the posture of the student and he makes also a comment on the character for the slow section: it reminds a saxophone melody, like a blues with Hungarian character and therefore it should be played by showing these harmonies, rhythms, colors and agogics which are typical of Hungarian music.
The professor makes also reference to popular music from Wallachia, region of Romania, and finally he proposes a certain fingering to get a timbre and sound more similar to the saxophone.
William Bennett starts the masterclass indicating the student not to breathe in a certain moment so he could avoid cutting the phrase. Besides some rhythmical corrections, Prof. Bennett mentions how important is to consider what the orchestra is playing so that the tempo is accurate, and he checks the phrasing for several passages.
Then, Bennett tells a story about Marcel Moyse in one of the rehearsals of this opera. He continues with phrasing (singing each phrase) and dynamical issues, and he corrects some questions about ornamentation.
Additionally, the professor recommends not to do so many unnecessary movements while playing. For a passage with repeated notes, he suggests playing it upbeat but in tempo and clearly. Finally, he proposes a phrasing with more metrical freedom in the cadence.
At the beginning of the masterclass, Prof. Bennett mentions that Jacques Ibert wrote this piece to Marcel Moyse, and he tells a story about how they met in a party and how the process of the creation of the composition happened. He mentions also the difficulty of the scale's passages and a recording he listened to with a special type of flute, and he talks about the differences on extension, holes, tuning, way to play it. Then, William Bennett makes a brief harmonic analysis and a reflection on certain scales for the piece.
Regarding the student's performance, the professor specially corrects the phrasing, among other musical aspects such as vibrato, character, tempo or accents. He gives her some indications on the attack to get a more appropriate performance.
Afterwards, they focus on the sonority and the way to obtain better colors and tuning. He advises keeping the mouth and lips position without moving so she could tune some notes better. Bennett makes also suggestions on fingerings, articulation, character (flamenco style), etc. To conclude, they work on the final part and the professor talks about the recorded version from Moyse, which doesn't include the low note at the very end.
About the orchestral excerpts from the Suite Daphnis et Chloe performed by the student, William Bennett makes some comments on tempo, appoggiaturas, harmony and harmonic process, etc.
The professor indicates also some phrasing issues (he shows them by singing) and he refers to this phrasing performed by Marcel Moyse . Afterwards, he makes other comments on sound quality and color, vibrato, fingerings and articulation.
To conclude, he talks about this solo performed by Oliver Bannister , the best one in his opinion. Besides, he adds some short corrections on phrasing, dynamics, or rhythm among other musical issues.
Prof. Bennett begins the lecture making some corrections on phrasing and appoggiaturas with trills for this orchestral excerpt: it should imitate loads of little birds fluttering. To obtain this character, William Bennett corrects also the articulation and he suggests that the sound at the end of a certain phrase should not stop so sharply but should end with more reverberation. Finally, he mentions other improvable aspects related to the repeating notes and the phrasing.
Professor Bennett starts the masterclass explaining the poem Trockne Blumen and the musical resources that describes the character of the theme and variations. He makes the harmonic analysis of the beginning of the piece. He mentions the importance of the dotted notes and its extra musical meaning. He explains a useful exercise to improve the tuning. The double dotted notes should be played melodically and not rhythmically.
Bennett compares the way to play close to the bridge and pressing too much in a string instrument with the kind of air emission in the flute. He mentions the Flute Concerto by Nielsen . When a composer says one thing twice, the second time is more intense. Bennett shows to the student how to work the legato.
In general, they work on aspects such as phrasing, articulation and character of each variation. Professor Bennett explains that a change in tempo implies a change of character. The articulation should be clearer, as we are singing the words. All the 'diminuendos' have to be played in a natural way. Some high and expressive pitches should be played as a vibrato on the strings. One recommendation is to finish completely a phrase before starting the new one.
Professor Bennett compares a specific passage of the piece with Schumann's Frohlicher Landmann, Op. 68 . The use of the accents in Schubert is to warn that the music has arrive somewhere - he mentions a Schubert's manuscript in which there are accents in the fourth part of the quartet. We should not be afraid of rushing the tempo when the score requires it. They work on scales in the way of Taffanel , going to the high note with more intention.
In general, they work in detail aspects such as phrasing, articulation and character of each variation. The phrasing is explained in relation to the harmony. Professor Bennett comments that sometimes it is necessary to adapt the lips to the embouchure to play some notes (e. g. D#). They also talk about different versions of the melody in some editions and study the breathing points in several passages, e. g. he advises the student not to breathe between phrases.
The first orchestral excerpt played by the student is well-controlled, just it's not advisable to put too much stress in some notes. After a brief comment on a performance of this composition by the London Symphony Orchestra, Bennett notes that in a passage of The Charlatan's Booth , she needs more energy on the up, and he makes some indications about vibrato so she could improve this. Regarding the waltz The Ballerina and the Moor , the professor makes some comments on the character, phrasing and articulation, mainly.
At the beginning, Professor Bennett talks about Der Freischutz plot. Taffanel took into account the Agatha's aria to compose this piece. It is very important the rhythm in piano part because it is the devil who comes. They work on phrasing and the relation with the breathing. The articulation and the dynamics are very important to get a good phrasing.
Bennett tells the student an anecdote of his biography. In virtuosic passages, the notes are not as in Debussy's music, but clearer and articulated. He also explains the use of the vibrato and clarifies the most important notes in some phrases. After a long note, it is not necessary to remark the following sound. One passage in the piece leads to practice a specific exercise to improve the vibrato and the sound balance: Bennett recommends to practice the book De la Sonorite by Marcel Moyse . Professor Bennett insists on keeping the tempo, without speeding up.
In this second part of the class, Bennett talks about the story of this opera, so the character of the piece should respond to the feelings contained at this moment of the drama. In a calm passage, the character has to avoid any stress, the sound should be very basic, not stop dreaming. It is also important the complete accuracy of the notes in the score. Bennett and the student work on phrasing and breathing, articulation and accents, rhythm and dynamics, use of the tongue and tuning. He also gives some indications to piano part.
Bennett explains to the student the problems she has in the embouchure to go from loud to soft, or from soft to softer, maybe it is a problem of the chin position.
At the end, Professor Bennett makes reference to the Melodic Studies by Marcel Moyse , in relation to sound balance. As examples, he plays some fragments from Fantaisie sur Der Freischutz by Weber, Faure's Fantasy, Manha de Carnaval by Bonfa and Voi che sapete by Mozart .
Professor Zakhar Bron starts the masterclass with a comment about the expressiveness: the student should show deeper feelings. Then, he makes some corrections about fingering related to the violin positions, and also about tempo and phrasing in certain passages.
About the sound, the professor recommends more clarity (legato, but not with much vibrato or glissando). Besides, Bron makes some indications on bow distribution regarding the required dynamics. After some suggestions to improve the character of the work, Bron recommends a freer phrasing. He proposes different fingerings and he highlights character and expressiveness issues. There is a dialog with the horn that the student should take into account and play it with less vibrato.
Moreover, Zakhar Bron makes some corrections about phrasing, tuning, articulation, or dynamics among others. Finally, the professor plays certain passages to show the student how to express properly some character and harmonic changes.
In the professor's opinion, the student's performance is very good but in general, it is limited in character, colors, sound, because she doesn't use the whole bow. The performance must transmit the feeling of movement even in the calm moments. Bron advises her not to use the second string, which is more suitable for other composers like Wieniawsky .
Every time the theme is repeated, the student should rethink about how to play it. Zakhar Bron is not satisfied with the relationship between vibrato, legato and bow division that the student shows. He also mentions that Canzonetta derives from Canzona (song), and therefore the character should be very natural, simple and liggerissimo.
After that, they go over the movement and play it together, and then Bron indicates the places to make rubato and where replace the vibrato regarding the harmonies. Besides, he corrects other specific musical aspects to get more expressiveness.
About the third movement of the Tchaikovsky's Violin Concerto , Zakhar Bron indicates firstly that the student should make more differences between piano and forte. Besides, he makes other corrections for specific moments such as being on time, play to the top of the bow, fingering improvement, etc.
Bron recommends her to prepare better her fingers: she needs more precision and more contact with the string to get a good sound. Afterwards, they address different issues related to vibrato, dynamics, advisable points to save the bow or phrasing, among others.
Zakhar Bron also points out the proper places to play with all the sound and finally, he mentions a certain passage where the student should not raise the fingers in order to maintain a better contact.
The professor corrects the pianist's articulation of some passages, melodic line, and motifs' identification. Afterwards, Kocsis explains some aspects regarding the tempo: meaning of Allegro, speed. He also works on issues such as the harmonic progression, dynamics and contrasts, sforzati, expressiveness, hemiola, and the maintenance of the metric pulse. Lastly, there are also some comments on the use of the pedal, trills, sound quality and phrasing.
Kocsis states that the rhythm should not be changed from one passage to the other. He also mentions some aspects related to the articulation, dynamics and sound, among others. The crescendo must be performed in accordance with the phrasing: following a question-answer pattern.
Kocsis also points out the attack on staccato, the accents, and on the use of the pedal in a particular passage, looking for a similarity of sound with a bassoon.
In this video, Zoltan Kocsis comments on the last movement of Beethoven's Sonata No. 18 the projection of the sound in sforzato and forte, the importance of certain notes depending on if they belong to the melody or if they are pedal notes, a more marcato or 'alla italiana' articulation, etc.
Afterwards, they work on issue related to the dynamics, accents, and the metrical freedom or rigor. The professor also explains that he should not use the pedal in some 'non legato' parts and points at the climax of the melody.
Regarding the first movement of Beethoven's Sonata No. 22 , Kocsis explains that the tempo must be slower and that the performer should play as if it was a Minuet.
The student is also given some dynamic advice, about the importance of identifying and highlighting the main melody and other harmonic issues. The professor also talks about the expression of the material and the character, and about how to rely on the pedal to achieve the proper length and articulation of the notes.
Overall, the professor explains that, musically speaking, the performance is correct, but as per the technique, the student should work on the position of the hands, keeping the distances without changing the position. There is a dichotomy: the melody must be emphasized but, at the same time, the notes must remain all equal.
The professor also talks about fingering, left hand, dynamics, sound balance, and attention to the main melody: a 'Perpetuum mobile' feeling. The student must also think about the harmony, avoid using the pedal too much, and, regarding the articulation, emphasize the dominant with a metric accent. To conclude, the professor advises the student to 'experiment' with his fingers and hands.
Zoltan Kocsis starts his lecture explaining that, in a formal sense, this work is bigger than the student has shown with his performance. Regarding the first chords from this movement in detail, in the professor's opinion they should be played more "seco" and staccatissimo. Then Kocsis makes some comments on the use of the pedal, articulation, brahmsian sound and accents.
Afterwards, they dial with dynamics, effects and character of the legato melody, or tempo and metrics aspects. Kocsis insists on character, agogical and dynamical issues for the second theme. In a certain passage, the marcato is very important and then the student must play more agitato so the audience does not get bored.
Regarding the following part, Prof. Kocsis suggests playing the rests without pedal and playing a little slowly but on time. They also talk about the pesante character in Brahms (here is not necessary for this early composition in comparison with others) and Kocsis highlights the importance of leading the audience to the next part. The student must be like an actor.
In this masterclass, they consider the student's performance must convince the audience that the piece is a masterpiece. It is on the limit; the professor would separate much more the materials in two: in orchestration and in dynamics (espressivo-non espressivo materials).
For the beginning, Zoltan Kocsis recommends the student not to play softer but keeping the same volume. Then he makes some indications on pedal and they work again on dynamical issues and phrasing. The professor also stresses that the student must release the pedal properly. About the theme, Prof. Kocsis points out that there are two different roles or characters and he also comments that the melodic line is more important than harmony itself.
In the first bars of the third movement is not advisable to wait so much, and about the next chords, it is important not to play the third. As in prior movements of this Sonata , Prof. Kocsis insists on the importance to convince the audience. Besides, different materials must have a connection. Kocsis also makes comments on articulation, rhythm and agogics, or use of the pedal among other issues related to this Scherzo.
The lecture by Kocsis begins with a general valuation of the performance. The main task for the student consists on convincing the audience that it is a masterpiece. About this specific movement, the professor corrects a particular rhythm: it is not a triplet. This Finale should be more active and vivo. Then Kocsis clarifies some questions to the student and insists on the importance of convincing with the form, specially in the last chords.
It is advisable 'not to think' during the performance. The class continues with general indications: agogics, tonality versus tonic, articulation of non legato, pedal changes, chords (resolutions and transitions), phrasing (the connection between notes), dynamics, attacks. The expression should be drier and the character drammatico. The student has to be careful with the last note of the triplets.
The class is focused on general indications about dynamics (crescendo and marcato), articulation in legato, tempo, agogics as the use of the ritardando, modulations and the difference between accompaniment and melody. The character must be more espressivo through the pressure and the tension of the fingers.
Concerning the student's performance for the first movement of this Haydn's Sonata , the professor firstly comments that some notes of the left-hand are not relevant. About the character from 2nd theme, this is legato and no staccato, and if the student is considering a contrast, she must really do it.
Besides, Zoltan Kocsis considers that the use of the pedal by the student is not typical from Haydn: it is legato but without pedal. Character is almost in the opera style, so the student must act more. Then Kocsis makes corrections on notes duration and articulation, fermatas, double slurs signs in the manuscript, harmonic progressions and dynamics. Finally, they talk about some issues related to polyphony and voices identification.
To begin with,Pprof. Kocsis has the feeling that the student doesn't enjoy this Sonata because her reading has not been so interesting as it should be, specially in this movement. He also comments the difference between editions: he prefers using the Henle one because a certain part is in G clef, such as in the manuscript.
About specific details, Kocsis talks about the staccatissimo performance. Legato parts also should be more cantabile and the rest, more "jocoso" and even ridiculous. After several short instructions, the professor advises her not to think so much: it is simpler than the student considers, although it is expressive and acting in some moments.
In a certain passage, the harmonic progression must be emphasized and then the student must realize that the two hands belong to one voice: connection between both hands is the most important thing here. After that, a cadence is necessary and finally there is a short comment related to metrics.
Prof. Kocsis have not understood some aspects from the student's performance, such as certain excessive subito changes of dynamics. Besides, in professor's opinion those should be on time. Regarding the beginning of the piece, Kocsis advises him not to relax the energy but to maintain it. Then he makes other indications about phrasing and articulation, and he recommends the typical fingering in Mozart .
The student must also be clear about what is more or less interesting. In this way, he could know what stand out by playing: harmonic progression is less interesting than melody, but afterwards the contrary happens.
Moreover, Zoltan Kocsis gives other recommendations related to the use of the pedal, contrast between both hands, and how to improve certain dynamical issues using fingers properly. Finally, he makes some comments on the required character for a certain passage and the way to express it ?EUR" not fighting too much. For the last two arpeggios he also suggests maintaining less the sound and, in general, taking care of the sound cleanliness and clarity.
According to Zoltan Kocsis , the performance of this movement should be simpler. Then, Kocsis explains the student that Polonaise must be played characterizing more its tempo. Here, the "keyword" is accent: if the student performs accents correctly, he will achieve the suitable character. To show this, the professor plays several fragments.
In certain moments it is also recommended not to hold back the tempo so much. Besides, Kocsis corrects articulation in a certain passage and later he highlights the recommendation to the student about not doing so much ritenuto and diminuendi, because this breaks the general character. Moreover, the sound should be more risoluto.
After some indications related to pedal, dynamics and staccato, Kocsis points out the importance to imagine the different voices as if they were instruments of the orchestra. In professor's opinion, there is no place for agogics in dances: those must be performed with metrical rigor.
Lastly, Prof. Kocsis thinks that it is not necessary to underline so much the second theme, because it is not a "real theme": Mozart's compositions are plenty of similar cases, for example in the 2nd movement of his Prague Symphony .
For this movement, in a general way, it is important to keep the relationship between the items. Regarding the theme, it must be much simpler at the discretion of Kocsis . To achieve that he suggests not using the pedal in certain parts. Articulation should not last that much at the beginning, however it should maintain the lightness and the dancing approach. Also, in the variations, character must be more dancing and for some of them, the professor recommends playing with a more staccato articulation.
In general, Kocsis can imagine that Mozart would prefer short accentuated notes, and he mentions a comment by Beethoven on this subject. On the other hand, the student has made beautiful things, and prof. Kocsis shows some examples of that. Anyway, he insists on the idea that this music must be simpler without need of explanation. Afterwards, he suggests doing more dynamical contrast in a certain passage. Finally, in order to play the figurations in tempo, Zoltan Kocsis recommends the student to practice with a metronome.
In this class, the professor explains how to show the melody and use less the pedal during the harmonic changes to avoid covering them. There are sections where the pedal is needed, but in others, there are different materials apart from the pedal than can also be used. It is also important to focus on the melody.
Kocsis mentions Prokofiev's orchestration with some examples and ponders aloud about the character, parts with new material, phrasing, tonality, sound and expression. He also talks about how there must be a balance between freedom and rigor.
In the end, the professor points out other aspects about different matters of the first movement of the Piano Sonata No. 6 , such as articulation, motifs, dynamics and tempo.
In this rehearsal, Maestro Kocsis emphasizes the importance of harmony changes at the beginning. He focuses on the main cue of horns and then the Professor and the orchestra work on it. Later, there are some corrections on horn and oboe parts related to the phrasing. The 'marcato' on the score has a specific function in the phrasing, so it has to sound different to the echo, with much more contrast.
Referring to dynamics, in passages with 'crescendo' it is necessary to achieve more intensity. He explains the connection between 'risoluto' and dynamics. He comments that Bach preferred playing with the viola instead of with the violin in an orchestra. The string section should pay attention to the 'sforzando', so they have to exaggerate a little to get a clear effect, and always 'sforzandi' in the second beat. In same moments, Kocsis holds the orchestra to avoid rushing.
Professor Kocsis advises the student on the use of another score edition. He makes some general indications about the technique of both pedals in Schumann (it is not sure whether the left pedal should be used when playing his compositions), sound, chords, rhythm, balance (outstanding voices) and dynamics.
The professor also focuses on some specific corrections of almost every piece in the Carnaval piece:
III. Arlequin: character, clarity, use of pedal.
IV. Valse noble: long phrasing, appassionato, differences in dynamics.
V. Eusebius: no pedal, character in sotto voce, tender.
VI. Florestan: more serious and ritenuto, annotations on the score without playing. 'Papillon motif'.
VIII. Replique - Sphinxes: rhythm and character at the beginning and then more contrast. The link between the two parts is like in Rachmaninov's music.
IX. Papillons: rhythm, articulation, and fingerings.
X. A.S.C.H. - S.C.H.A. (Lettres dansantes): recommendation about repetitions.
XI. Chiarina: rhythm, octaves, passionate character, articulation.
XII. Chopin: attention to the melody.
XIV. Reconnaissance: tempo, editions, and authorship (Robert or Clara).
XV. Pantalon et Colombine: articulation, melody, harmony.
XVI. Valse allemande: pedal and staccato.
XIX. Promenade: too intellectual,...